❓ A parliamentary question seeks information on the heritage listing process for sugar gum trees in Guildford, including nomination dates, Heritage Council considerations, and ministerial decisions. The response indicates the trees were considered as part of a wider heritage precinct, and no ministerial decisions have been made.
AnsweredQoN 5982Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(1) On what date were the sugar gum trees in Guildford nominated for heritage listing and by whom?
(2) On what date or dates was the interim heritage listing considered by the Heritage Council?
(3) On what date did the Minister sign the interim heritage listing?
(4) On what date or dates was the permanent listing considered by the Heritage Council; and
(a) what was the recommendation of the Heritage Council?
(5) Has the Minister made any decisions with regard to the sugar gums in Guildford, and if so:
(a) what were the decisions and on what date were they taken?
(2) On what date or dates was the interim heritage listing considered by the Heritage Council?
(3) On what date did the Minister sign the interim heritage listing?
(4) On what date or dates was the permanent listing considered by the Heritage Council; and
(a) what was the recommendation of the Heritage Council?
(5) Has the Minister made any decisions with regard to the sugar gums in Guildford, and if so:
(a) what were the decisions and on what date were they taken?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
20 September 2011
Responded by
Minister for Heritage
Response time
41 days
(1) The nomination of sugar gum trees in Guildford was received by the Office of Heritage on 22 January 2010. The nomination was from the Guildford Association.
(2) The Heritage Council's Register Committee considered the nomination on 26 March 2010. After careful consideration the Committee resolved that the trees should not be considered in isolation, but as part of a wider Guildford heritage precinct. The Guildford Association was advised of the decision and that it would be consulted through the assessment process.
(3) Not applicable.
(4) Not applicable.
(a) Not applicable.
(5) No decisions have been made by the Minister with regard to the sugar gums in Guildford.
(a) Not applicable.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(2) The Heritage Council's Register Committee considered the nomination on 26 March 2010. After careful consideration the Committee resolved that the trees should not be considered in isolation, but as part of a wider Guildford heritage precinct. The Guildford Association was advised of the decision and that it would be consulted through the assessment process.
(3) Not applicable.
(4) Not applicable.
(a) Not applicable.
(5) No decisions have been made by the Minister with regard to the sugar gums in Guildford.
(a) Not applicable.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.