Hon. Ljiljanna Ravlich asks the Minister for Health about agencies within the Health portfolio providing unsatisfactory financial documents for audit, potentially causing delays and increased costs. The Minister responds that no agencies within the Health portfolio were identified in the audit.

AnsweredQoN 3290Legislative Council
Asked
15 February 2011
Portfolio
Health

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the WA Auditor General Audit Results Report Annual 2009-10 Assurance Audits Report 10 Nov 2010, in section five ‘Quality and Timeliness of Financial Reporting’ on page 30 where it refers to too many Agencies providing documents of unsatisfactory quality, causing audit costs to rise , often significantly, which can delay the issuing of the opinion and the tabling of the annual report, and I ask -
(1) What are the Agencies under the Minister’s portfolio that the audit is referring to?
(2) Have any Annual Reports of these agencies been delayed because of the unsatisfactory quality of their documents for audit?
(3) What action has been taken to ensure these Agencies are able to improve their financial statements for audit?
(4) Can the Minister give an assurance that these agencies will implement better quality control processes to improve the material they submit in time for the next audit?
(5) If no to (4), why not?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
21 March 2011
Responded by
Minister for Mental Health representing the Minister for Health
Response time
34 days
(1) None of the agencies with adverse comments that the audit is referring to fall under the Health portfolio.
(2-5) Not applicable.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more