A parliamentary question regarding the Perth Stadium pedestrian bridge and the potential loss of engineering and fabrication jobs. The Minister's response is challenged, leading to a point of order regarding the tabling of notes.

AnsweredQoN 947Legislative Assembly
Asked
12 November 2015
Portfolio
Transport

QuestionView source ↗

PERTH
STADIUM — PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
947. Mr F.M. LOGAN to the Minister for
Transport:
I have a supplementary question.
From the tone of the ministerXXX ###XXXs answer,
obviously, he is going to stand back and watch more engineering and fabrication
jobs disappear, is he not?

AnswerView source ↗

I will take that as a statement
rather than a question.
Point of Order
Mrs M.H. ROBERTS : The minister
quoted from a document handed to him during question time. I call upon him to
table the document he read from.
Mr D.C. NALDER : They were notes
provided by the Treasurer across to me and I referred to them.
Mrs
M.H. ROBERTS : Further to that point of order, they are therefore official
notes that need to be handed over. That is the ruling. They are not his notes
and he directly quoted from them.
The SPEAKER : It is only if the
notes are official.
Several members interjected.
The SPEAKER : I am not going
to argue about it and that is it. Thank you.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more