❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding the enforcement and resolution of 'Orders to Remedy' issued by the Building Disputes Tribunal (BDT), specifically focusing on a case involving Tangent Nominees.
AnsweredQoN 6339Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Has the action required of the builder through the issue of this order been completed?
(2) If no to (1), how is it possible for the builder (Tangent Nominees) to ignore the order to remedy for three and a half years without repercussion?
(3) How many ‘Orders to Remedy’ have been issued by the BDT in the past five years?
(4) How many of them have been resolved?
(5) How many cases have been heard before the BDT over the past five years?
(6) In how many of these cases have the Tribunal ruled in favour of the builder?
(2) If no to (1), how is it possible for the builder (Tangent Nominees) to ignore the order to remedy for three and a half years without repercussion?
(3) How many ‘Orders to Remedy’ have been issued by the BDT in the past five years?
(4) How many of them have been resolved?
(5) How many cases have been heard before the BDT over the past five years?
(6) In how many of these cases have the Tribunal ruled in favour of the builder?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
24 June 2008
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Consumer Protection
Response time
28 days
(1) No
(2) Order to Remedy 254/2004-05 issued on 21 January 2005 was set aside by the Tribunal on 12 June 2006, on the basis that Mr Willis may seek an Order to Pay in lieu thereof. Subsequently, an Order to Pay in favour of Mr Willis was subsequently made by the Tribunal on 28 November 2007, which the builder complied with.
(3) 1941
(4) 1584
(5) 1666
(6) Statistics relating to cases ruled in favour of either party are not recorded, as an Order may contain a number of items, which may be in favour of the builder and/or the owner.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(2) Order to Remedy 254/2004-05 issued on 21 January 2005 was set aside by the Tribunal on 12 June 2006, on the basis that Mr Willis may seek an Order to Pay in lieu thereof. Subsequently, an Order to Pay in favour of Mr Willis was subsequently made by the Tribunal on 28 November 2007, which the builder complied with.
(3) 1941
(4) 1584
(5) 1666
(6) Statistics relating to cases ruled in favour of either party are not recorded, as an Order may contain a number of items, which may be in favour of the builder and/or the owner.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.