❓ Hon. Norman Moore questions Hon. Ken Travers, Minister for State Development, regarding the Coral Coast Marina Development at Mauds Landing, specifically about an economic/social benefits analysis by the Department of Industry and Resources. The Minister states no analysis was undertaken by that department as they were not involved.
AnsweredQoN 1677Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer the minister to his answer to question on notice 1248, and notwithstanding the Premier’s decision on the Coral Coast Marina Development Pty Ltd resort proposal, I ask the minister for the third time - (1) Did the Department of Industry and Resources provide the minister or the Government with an analysis of the economic and/or social benefits for the State that would result from the Coral Coast Marina Development Pty Ltd resort proposal for development at Mauds Landing? (2) If so, will the minister table the relevant reports; and, if not, why not? (3) If no such analysis was undertaken, can the minister explain why not? (4) Will the minister explain his reluctance to answer the above questions on two previous occasions? Hon KEN TRAVERS
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(1) Did the Department of Industry and Resources provide the minister or the Government with an analysis of the economic and/or social benefits for the State that would result from the Coral Coast Marina Development Pty Ltd resort proposal for development at Mauds Landing? (2) If so, will the minister table the relevant reports; and, if not, why not? (3) If no such analysis was undertaken, can the minister explain why not? (4) Will the minister explain his reluctance to answer the above questions on two previous occasions? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(2) If so, will the minister table the relevant reports; and, if not, why not? (3) If no such analysis was undertaken, can the minister explain why not? (4) Will the minister explain his reluctance to answer the above questions on two previous occasions? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(3) If no such analysis was undertaken, can the minister explain why not? (4) Will the minister explain his reluctance to answer the above questions on two previous occasions? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(4) Will the minister explain his reluctance to answer the above questions on two previous occasions? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(1) Did the Department of Industry and Resources provide the minister or the Government with an analysis of the economic and/or social benefits for the State that would result from the Coral Coast Marina Development Pty Ltd resort proposal for development at Mauds Landing? (2) If so, will the minister table the relevant reports; and, if not, why not? (3) If no such analysis was undertaken, can the minister explain why not? (4) Will the minister explain his reluctance to answer the above questions on two previous occasions? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(2) If so, will the minister table the relevant reports; and, if not, why not? (3) If no such analysis was undertaken, can the minister explain why not? (4) Will the minister explain his reluctance to answer the above questions on two previous occasions? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(3) If no such analysis was undertaken, can the minister explain why not? (4) Will the minister explain his reluctance to answer the above questions on two previous occasions? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(4) Will the minister explain his reluctance to answer the above questions on two previous occasions? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(2) Not applicable. (3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(3) The Department of Industry and Resources was not involved in the Coral Coast Marina Development resort proposal. (4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
(4) A response to the questions was provided in answer to parliamentary question on notice 1248.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.