❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding a survey conducted to determine the extent and nature of odour problems in a local community, including its cost, methodology, and public accessibility.
AnsweredQoN 853Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(2) What was the aim of the survey? (3) Who undertook the survey? (4) What was the cost of the survey? (5) How many people were contacted? (6) Will the Minister table a copy of the survey and any subsequent reports? (7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
14 November 2000
Response time
27 days
(1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
(3) Who undertook the survey? (4) What was the cost of the survey? (5) How many people were contacted? (6) Will the Minister table a copy of the survey and any subsequent reports? (7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
(4) What was the cost of the survey? (5) How many people were contacted? (6) Will the Minister table a copy of the survey and any subsequent reports? (7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
(5) How many people were contacted? (6) Will the Minister table a copy of the survey and any subsequent reports? (7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
(6) Will the Minister table a copy of the survey and any subsequent reports? (7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
(7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
(3) Who undertook the survey? (4) What was the cost of the survey? (5) How many people were contacted? (6) Will the Minister table a copy of the survey and any subsequent reports? (7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
(4) What was the cost of the survey? (5) How many people were contacted? (6) Will the Minister table a copy of the survey and any subsequent reports? (7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
(5) How many people were contacted? (6) Will the Minister table a copy of the survey and any subsequent reports? (7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
(6) Will the Minister table a copy of the survey and any subsequent reports? (7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
(7) If not, why not? Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
Answered on 14 November 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) 20 and 21 May 2000. (2)(a) To accurately determine the extent and nature of the odour problems in the area as the basis for planning an appropriate public relations response to managing communications with the local community. (b) To obtain a benchmark measure of the extent of the odour problem to allow future tracking studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both communications and physical improvements to the plant. (3) Market Equity. (4) $18,065.00. (5) 824 households. (6) Yes. See Paper No ____.). (7) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.