A WA parliamentary question on notice from 2006 requesting a breakdown of outstanding creditor payments for agencies within the Minister's portfolio. The response details the amounts and number of creditors outstanding for varying periods across the Small Business Development Corporation, Peel Development Commission, and South West Development Commission.

AnsweredQoN 1369Legislative Assembly
Asked
15 August 2006
Portfolio
Small Business; Peel and the South West; Minister Assisting the Minister for Education and Training

QuestionView source ↗

For each Department and Agency within the Minister’s portfolio -
(1) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 30 days as at 30 June 2006?
(2) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 60 days as at 30 June 2006?
(3) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 90 days as at 30 June 2006?
(4) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding for less than or equal to 120 days as at 30 June 2006?
(5) What was the amount and number of creditors outstanding more than 120 days as at 30 June 2006?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
12 September 2006
Responded by
Minister for Small Business; Peel and the South West; Minister Assisting the Minister for Education and Training
Response time
28 days
The Small Business Development Corporation (SBDC) makes every effort to pay creditors within 30 days. As at 30 June 2006 there were no creditors outstanding for more than 30 days. (1) $31,832.62 representing 21 creditors. (2) - (5) Nil Peel Development Commission (1) 9 creditors valued at $52,708.79 (2) 1 creditor valued at $16,443.00* (3) - (5) Nil * Invoice was not received by the accounts section until after the cut off for payment by 30 June 2006. South West Development Commission (1) $87214 - 18 creditors (2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
(1) $31,832.62 representing 21 creditors. (2) - (5) Nil Peel Development Commission (1) 9 creditors valued at $52,708.79 (2) 1 creditor valued at $16,443.00* (3) - (5) Nil * Invoice was not received by the accounts section until after the cut off for payment by 30 June 2006. South West Development Commission (1) $87214 - 18 creditors (2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
(2) - (5) Nil Peel Development Commission (1) 9 creditors valued at $52,708.79 (2) 1 creditor valued at $16,443.00* (3) - (5) Nil * Invoice was not received by the accounts section until after the cut off for payment by 30 June 2006. South West Development Commission (1) $87214 - 18 creditors (2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
Peel Development Commission (1) 9 creditors valued at $52,708.79 (2) 1 creditor valued at $16,443.00* (3) - (5) Nil * Invoice was not received by the accounts section until after the cut off for payment by 30 June 2006. South West Development Commission (1) $87214 - 18 creditors (2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
(1) 9 creditors valued at $52,708.79 (2) 1 creditor valued at $16,443.00* (3) - (5) Nil * Invoice was not received by the accounts section until after the cut off for payment by 30 June 2006. South West Development Commission (1) $87214 - 18 creditors (2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
(2) 1 creditor valued at $16,443.00* (3) - (5) Nil * Invoice was not received by the accounts section until after the cut off for payment by 30 June 2006. South West Development Commission (1) $87214 - 18 creditors (2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
(3) - (5) Nil * Invoice was not received by the accounts section until after the cut off for payment by 30 June 2006. South West Development Commission (1) $87214 - 18 creditors (2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
* Invoice was not received by the accounts section until after the cut off for payment by 30 June 2006. South West Development Commission (1) $87214 - 18 creditors (2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
South West Development Commission (1) $87214 - 18 creditors (2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
(1) $87214 - 18 creditors (2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
(2) $757 - 1 creditor* (3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
(3)-(5) 0 creditors * Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.
* Goods received were returned due to inferior quality. Invoice not processed until new product received.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more