A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding lost or stolen mobile phones within the Tourism portfolio, revealing that only the Rottnest Island Authority reported losses and implemented a review of building access in response.

AnsweredQoN 4676Legislative Council
Asked
20 March 2007
Portfolio
Tourism

QuestionView source ↗

For each Department and Agency under the Minister’s control, including the Ministerial office -
(1) How many mobile phones have been reported lost or stolen for the six months to 31 December 2006?
(2) What was the total value of the mobile phones that were lost or stolen?
(3) Was the loss or theft of any of these mobile phones reported to the police?
(4) If yes to (3), when were these reports made?
(5) Of those reported, what has been the outcome?
(6) If any were not reported to the police, why not?
(7) What steps, if any, have been put into place with a view to eliminating, or at least reducing, these losses?
(8) When were these steps put into place?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
1 May 2007
Responded by
Minister for Regional Development representing the Minister for Tourism
Response time
42 days
Please refer to question on notice 4653. Tourism WA (1) Nil. (2)-(8) N/A. Rottnest Island Authority (1) Three. (2) $360. (3) Yes. (4) 14 December 2006. (5) None have been recovered. (6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
Tourism WA (1) Nil. (2)-(8) N/A. Rottnest Island Authority (1) Three. (2) $360. (3) Yes. (4) 14 December 2006. (5) None have been recovered. (6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
(1) Nil. (2)-(8) N/A. Rottnest Island Authority (1) Three. (2) $360. (3) Yes. (4) 14 December 2006. (5) None have been recovered. (6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
(2)-(8) N/A. Rottnest Island Authority (1) Three. (2) $360. (3) Yes. (4) 14 December 2006. (5) None have been recovered. (6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
Rottnest Island Authority (1) Three. (2) $360. (3) Yes. (4) 14 December 2006. (5) None have been recovered. (6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
(1) Three. (2) $360. (3) Yes. (4) 14 December 2006. (5) None have been recovered. (6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
(2) $360. (3) Yes. (4) 14 December 2006. (5) None have been recovered. (6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
(3) Yes. (4) 14 December 2006. (5) None have been recovered. (6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
(4) 14 December 2006. (5) None have been recovered. (6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
(5) None have been recovered. (6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
(6) Not applicable. (7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
(7) A review of building access was undertaken. (8) December 2006.
(8) December 2006.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more