❓ Hon George Cash asked the Deputy Premier whether certain government entities took specific actions in 2002 or 2003. The response indicates varying actions across different entities, but generally declines to provide summaries due to resource constraints and potential legal issues.
AnsweredQoN 12Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(b) 2002; or (c) 2003?
(c) 2003?
(c) 2003?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
3 May 2005
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Deputy Premier
Response time
35 days
(1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Government Employees Super Board (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Government Employees Super Board (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Government Employees Super Board (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Government Employees Super Board (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Government Employees Super Board (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Gold Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Insurance Commission (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Lotterywest (1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a) No (b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(b)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Office of Native Title (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Office of the Auditor General (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
State Supply Commission (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
Treasury (1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter. WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
WA Treasury Corporation (1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) No (2) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.