❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks details on government funding for Swan River bank erosion programs from 2002-2005, including allocations, program details, outcomes, and reasons for underspending. The Minister provides figures and explanations, citing collaborative funding models and project lead times.
AnsweredQoN 90Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; (c) if the full $500,000 was not spent, why not; (d) how much was allocated by the Government in the financial year 2003/2004 on bank erosion, restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (e) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; (f) if the full allocated amount was not spent, why not; (g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(c) if the full $500,000 was not spent, why not; (d) how much was allocated by the Government in the financial year 2003/2004 on bank erosion, restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (e) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; (f) if the full allocated amount was not spent, why not; (g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(d) how much was allocated by the Government in the financial year 2003/2004 on bank erosion, restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (e) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; (f) if the full allocated amount was not spent, why not; (g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(e) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; (f) if the full allocated amount was not spent, why not; (g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(f) if the full allocated amount was not spent, why not; (g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(a) The announcement on 12 June 2002 was, in fact, for a total of $500,000 to be spent on bank erosion of the Swan River over a four year period, not $500,000 per annum as stated in the question. However, in response to this question, $162,725 was spent on restoration or prevention programs in 2002/2003. (b) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (c) Answered by (a). (d) $125,000. (e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
However, in response to this question, $162,725 was spent on restoration or prevention programs in 2002/2003. (b) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (c) Answered by (a). (d) $125,000. (e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(b) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (c) Answered by (a). (d) $125,000. (e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(c) Answered by (a). (d) $125,000. (e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(d) $125,000. (e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(c) if the full $500,000 was not spent, why not; (d) how much was allocated by the Government in the financial year 2003/2004 on bank erosion, restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (e) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; (f) if the full allocated amount was not spent, why not; (g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(d) how much was allocated by the Government in the financial year 2003/2004 on bank erosion, restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (e) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; (f) if the full allocated amount was not spent, why not; (g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(e) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; (f) if the full allocated amount was not spent, why not; (g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(f) if the full allocated amount was not spent, why not; (g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(g) how much was allocated by the Government in the 2004/2005 financial year on bank erosion restoration or prevention programs for the Swan River; (h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(h) what were the natures of those programs, and what were their outcomes; and (i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(i) if the full allocated amount will not be spent this financial year, why not?
(a) The announcement on 12 June 2002 was, in fact, for a total of $500,000 to be spent on bank erosion of the Swan River over a four year period, not $500,000 per annum as stated in the question. However, in response to this question, $162,725 was spent on restoration or prevention programs in 2002/2003. (b) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (c) Answered by (a). (d) $125,000. (e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
However, in response to this question, $162,725 was spent on restoration or prevention programs in 2002/2003. (b) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (c) Answered by (a). (d) $125,000. (e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(b) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (c) Answered by (a). (d) $125,000. (e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(c) Answered by (a). (d) $125,000. (e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(d) $125,000. (e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004. (g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(g) $1 million. (h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs. (i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(i) River bank funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional. Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year. An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year. Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
16 August 2005
Responded by
Minister for the Environment
Response time
49 days
The Minister for the Environment; Science has provided the following response:
(a) The announcement on 12 June 2002 was, in fact, for a total of $500,000 to be spent on bank erosion of the Swan River
over a four year period, not $500,000 per annum
as stated in the question.
However, in response to this question, $162,725 was spent on restoration or prevention programs in 2002/2003.
(b) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs.
(c) Answered by (a).
(d) $125,000.
(e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs.
(f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004.
(g) $1 million.
(h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs.
(i) River
bank
funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional.
Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year.
An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year.
Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
(a) The announcement on 12 June 2002 was, in fact, for a total of $500,000 to be spent on bank erosion of the Swan River
over a four year period, not $500,000 per annum
as stated in the question.
However, in response to this question, $162,725 was spent on restoration or prevention programs in 2002/2003.
(b) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs.
(c) Answered by (a).
(d) $125,000.
(e) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs.
(f) $125,000 was spent in 2003/2004.
(g) $1 million.
(h) The attached table sets out the nature and outcome of those programs.
(i) River
bank
funding is available to work with local government on a dollar for dollar basis. Local governments require a lead time to budget for substantial projects. Time is also required for the design phase to ensure foreshore restoration works are environmentally appropriate and functional.
Therefore, while there has been a high level of interest by local government, there have been insufficient collaborative projects to expend the full amount in this financial year.
An amount of $1 million has been allocated for Riverbank funding of which $612,948 has been expended on various projects see attachment for details with the remaining balance to be utilised in the 2005/2006 financial year.
Projects that have been in preparation, together with new projects, will be expected to see the expenditure of all available Riverbank funds in 2005/2006.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.