❓ A parliamentary question regarding the management of Carlton Hill Station, focusing on cattle quotas, erosion, weed infestations, and protection of nearby ecological communities. The Minister's response deflects responsibility for weed and conservation issues to other departments and cites limitations in requiring fencing.
AnsweredQoN 492Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to Carlton Hill Station in the Kimberley owned by Kimberley Agricultural Investment (KAI), and ask:
(a) what is the maximum amount of cattle allowed on the station;
(b) when was the station last inspected to determine if it was complying with its obligations regarding ecologically sustainable management and not exceeding its cattle quota;
(c) have any erosion problems been identified on Carlton Hill Station;
(d) if yes to (c), where is erosion an issue and what has KAI been asked to do to solve the problems;
(e) is the Minister aware that there are heavy infestations of calotropis procera, a declared weed in Western Australia on Carlton Hill Station;
(f) has the department taken any measures to ensure this declared weed is being managed by the station owners, KAI;
(g) if no to (f), why not;
(h) how many hectares of land has been estimated to be infested with calotropis procera;
(i) is the Minister aware of the Priority 1 ecological community "Assemblages of the wetlands associated with the organic mound springs on the tidal mudflats of the Victoria-Bonaparte Bioregion" north of Carlton Hill Station;
(j) is the Minister aware that these threatened ecosystems are currently being damaged by cattle and the likelihood of the cattle being from Carlton Hill Station due to the station not being properly fenced to these areas;
(k) will the Minister ensure that KAI will fence the boundary of the station to ensure that mound springs and the Ramsar listed wetlands are not damaged by cattle; and
(l) if no to (k), why not?
(a) what is the maximum amount of cattle allowed on the station;
(b) when was the station last inspected to determine if it was complying with its obligations regarding ecologically sustainable management and not exceeding its cattle quota;
(c) have any erosion problems been identified on Carlton Hill Station;
(d) if yes to (c), where is erosion an issue and what has KAI been asked to do to solve the problems;
(e) is the Minister aware that there are heavy infestations of calotropis procera, a declared weed in Western Australia on Carlton Hill Station;
(f) has the department taken any measures to ensure this declared weed is being managed by the station owners, KAI;
(g) if no to (f), why not;
(h) how many hectares of land has been estimated to be infested with calotropis procera;
(i) is the Minister aware of the Priority 1 ecological community "Assemblages of the wetlands associated with the organic mound springs on the tidal mudflats of the Victoria-Bonaparte Bioregion" north of Carlton Hill Station;
(j) is the Minister aware that these threatened ecosystems are currently being damaged by cattle and the likelihood of the cattle being from Carlton Hill Station due to the station not being properly fenced to these areas;
(k) will the Minister ensure that KAI will fence the boundary of the station to ensure that mound springs and the Ramsar listed wetlands are not damaged by cattle; and
(l) if no to (k), why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
6 December 2017
Responded by
Minister for Environment representing the Minister for Lands
Response time
9 days
(b) The last rangeland condition assessment (RCA) on Carlton Hill Station was carried out by the then Department of Agriculture and Food in 2004. A follow up inspection occurred in 2008. (c) Yes (d) Severe erosion was noted in the Ivanhoe land system as part of rangeland condition assessments conducted in 2004 and 2008. The lessee at the time was required to submit a management plan to address land management issues. (e)-(h) Management of declared weed species is regulated under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007, which is administered by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. (i)-(l) This relates to a conservation matter managed by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. The Land Administration Act 1997 does not empower the Minister for Lands to require pastoral lessees to construct boundary fences.
(c) Yes (d) Severe erosion was noted in the Ivanhoe land system as part of rangeland condition assessments conducted in 2004 and 2008. The lessee at the time was required to submit a management plan to address land management issues. (e)-(h) Management of declared weed species is regulated under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007, which is administered by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. (i)-(l) This relates to a conservation matter managed by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. The Land Administration Act 1997 does not empower the Minister for Lands to require pastoral lessees to construct boundary fences.
(d) Severe erosion was noted in the Ivanhoe land system as part of rangeland condition assessments conducted in 2004 and 2008. The lessee at the time was required to submit a management plan to address land management issues. (e)-(h) Management of declared weed species is regulated under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007, which is administered by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. (i)-(l) This relates to a conservation matter managed by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. The Land Administration Act 1997 does not empower the Minister for Lands to require pastoral lessees to construct boundary fences.
(e)-(h) Management of declared weed species is regulated under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007, which is administered by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. (i)-(l) This relates to a conservation matter managed by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. The Land Administration Act 1997 does not empower the Minister for Lands to require pastoral lessees to construct boundary fences.
(i)-(l) This relates to a conservation matter managed by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. The Land Administration Act 1997 does not empower the Minister for Lands to require pastoral lessees to construct boundary fences.
(c) Yes (d) Severe erosion was noted in the Ivanhoe land system as part of rangeland condition assessments conducted in 2004 and 2008. The lessee at the time was required to submit a management plan to address land management issues. (e)-(h) Management of declared weed species is regulated under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007, which is administered by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. (i)-(l) This relates to a conservation matter managed by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. The Land Administration Act 1997 does not empower the Minister for Lands to require pastoral lessees to construct boundary fences.
(d) Severe erosion was noted in the Ivanhoe land system as part of rangeland condition assessments conducted in 2004 and 2008. The lessee at the time was required to submit a management plan to address land management issues. (e)-(h) Management of declared weed species is regulated under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007, which is administered by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. (i)-(l) This relates to a conservation matter managed by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. The Land Administration Act 1997 does not empower the Minister for Lands to require pastoral lessees to construct boundary fences.
(e)-(h) Management of declared weed species is regulated under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007, which is administered by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. (i)-(l) This relates to a conservation matter managed by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. The Land Administration Act 1997 does not empower the Minister for Lands to require pastoral lessees to construct boundary fences.
(i)-(l) This relates to a conservation matter managed by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. The Land Administration Act 1997 does not empower the Minister for Lands to require pastoral lessees to construct boundary fences.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.