❓ A WA parliamentary question requesting details on ex gratia payments made by agencies under the Minister's portfolio since February 2001, including recipient names, amounts, reasons, and processes. The response details payments made by various departments, citing reasons such as stolen items, salinity compensation, and errors in land administration.
AnsweredQoN 632Legislative Assembly
Asked
28 March 2006
Member
Portfolio
Housing and Works; Consumer Protection; Heritage; Land Information
QuestionView source ↗
Will the Minister please inform the House as to any
ex gratia
or similar payments made by any agencies or departments since February 2001 under the Minister’s portfolio responsibilities, including:
(1) The name of the person receiving the payment?
(2) The amount of the payment?
(3) The reasons for the payment?
(4) The processes undertaken between the application, or proposal, for such a payment to be made, and the making of that payment?
ex gratia
or similar payments made by any agencies or departments since February 2001 under the Minister’s portfolio responsibilities, including:
(1) The name of the person receiving the payment?
(2) The amount of the payment?
(3) The reasons for the payment?
(4) The processes undertaken between the application, or proposal, for such a payment to be made, and the making of that payment?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
3 May 2006
Responded by
Minister for Housing and Works; Consumer Protection; Heritage; Land Information
Response time
36 days
1) (a) Ms Shondelle Dimer (b) Ms Carli Susinetti 2) (a) $250 (b) $249 3) (a) Personal items (money and mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. (b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(b) Ms Carli Susinetti 2) (a) $250 (b) $249 3) (a) Personal items (money and mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. (b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
2) (a) $250 (b) $249 3) (a) Personal items (money and mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. (b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(b) $249 3) (a) Personal items (money and mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. (b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
3) (a) Personal items (money and mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. (b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(b) Ms Carli Susinetti 2) (a) $250 (b) $249 3) (a) Personal items (money and mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. (b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
2) (a) $250 (b) $249 3) (a) Personal items (money and mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. (b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(b) $249 3) (a) Personal items (money and mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. (b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
3) (a) Personal items (money and mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. (b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(b) Personal item (mobile phone) stolen from the workplace. 4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
4) The Department carried out internal investigations, a report was made to police and the Department obtained and received Executive and Ministerial approvals. The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
The Heritage Council of Western Australia advise: (1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(1)-(4) Not applicable The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
The Department of Consumer Protection advise: (1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(1)- (4) See table paper no. The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
The Department of Land Administration advise: (1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(1) The names are not provided due to confidentiality clauses in the Deeds of Release and rights of privacy of the individuals concerned. (2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(2)-(3) $500 000 - salinity compensation claim $12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$12 500 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$6 000 - wrongful lapsing of a caveat $400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$400 - legal costs incurred in arranging for the production of a duplicate certificate of title due to an error $105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$105 000 - compensation for a forged mortgage $1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$1 400 - reimbursements of costs incurred in settling an adverse possession application $10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$10 175 - costs incurred for the incorrect approval for a subdivision $720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$720 - incorrect realignment of a lot number $1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$1 047 - compensation for resumed land $220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$220 - reimbursement of costs associated with the withdrawal of a valuation appeal $495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$495 - legal costs incurred resulting from incorrect information received regarding the registration of an easement $763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$763 - reimbursement of costs incurred by a client relating to a delay in the property settlement $619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$619 - costs incurred resulting from incorrect registered proprietor being shown on the Certificate of Title $3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
$3129 - caveat incorrectly cancelled (4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
(4) Applications for compensation sought under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , against the Registrar of Titles are reviewed and investigated by the Commissioner of Titles, the Deputy Commissioner of Titles and In-House Legal Counsel and in some situations the State Solicitors Office are required to assist in the determination process. The Commissioner of Titles in his statutory capacity, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented, request clarification or recommend that the applicant apply for a court determination. These are usually related to claims for compensation under the Transfer of Land Act 1893 . The Commissioner then recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment. The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
The similar process is adopted for Ex Gratia (Act of Grace) payments that are made for matters related to the Transfer of Land Act 1893 , where the applicant has substantiated a loss. Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
Applications for other ex gratia payments are reviewed and investigated by the Department. The Chief Executive, in his capacity as Accountable Officer, will make a decision based on the merit and facts presented and recommends and seeks the Hon Minister's approval to process the payment.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.