❓ Mr. Buswell asks about prosecutions in the building industry. The Minister provides details on three cases, noting limitations in access to police records and suggesting further questions be directed to the Minister for Police.
AnsweredQoN 575Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) the person or persons alleged to have committed the offence; (c) the nature of the alleged offences; (d) the outcomes of each case; (e) the nature of fines and penalties; (f) if the matter was referred to the police by the Building Industry Special Projects Inspectorate; and (g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
(c) the nature of the alleged offences; (d) the outcomes of each case; (e) the nature of fines and penalties; (f) if the matter was referred to the police by the Building Industry Special Projects Inspectorate; and (g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
(d) the outcomes of each case; (e) the nature of fines and penalties; (f) if the matter was referred to the police by the Building Industry Special Projects Inspectorate; and (g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
(e) the nature of fines and penalties; (f) if the matter was referred to the police by the Building Industry Special Projects Inspectorate; and (g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
(f) if the matter was referred to the police by the Building Industry Special Projects Inspectorate; and (g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
(g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
Prosecution 1 (a) July 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Threats to Influence. (d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006. (e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(a) July 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Threats to Influence. (d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006. (e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Threats to Influence. (d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006. (e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(c) Threats to Influence. (d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006. (e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006. (e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(g) Unknown.
(c) the nature of the alleged offences; (d) the outcomes of each case; (e) the nature of fines and penalties; (f) if the matter was referred to the police by the Building Industry Special Projects Inspectorate; and (g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
(d) the outcomes of each case; (e) the nature of fines and penalties; (f) if the matter was referred to the police by the Building Industry Special Projects Inspectorate; and (g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
(e) the nature of fines and penalties; (f) if the matter was referred to the police by the Building Industry Special Projects Inspectorate; and (g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
(f) if the matter was referred to the police by the Building Industry Special Projects Inspectorate; and (g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
(g) if the complaint was made directly to the police and by whom?
Prosecution 1 (a) July 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Threats to Influence. (d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006. (e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(a) July 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Threats to Influence. (d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006. (e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Threats to Influence. (d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006. (e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(c) Threats to Influence. (d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006. (e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006. (e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(e) Not applicable. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(g) Unknown. Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
Prosecution 2 (a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(a) November 2002. (b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(b) Joseph McDonald. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(e) $800 fine and $243 costs. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(g) Unknown. Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
Prosecution 3 (a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(a) November 2002. (b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(b) Campbell McCullough. (c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(c) Common Assault. (d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(d) Guilty Verdict. (e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction. (f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation. (g) Unknown.
(g) Unknown.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
29 March 2006
Responded by
Minister for Employment Protection
Response time
22 days
The Department of Consumer and Employment Protection, Building Industry Special Projects Inspectorate (BISPI), provided me details on three criminal prosecutions that it is aware have been taken by the Western Australian Police Service (WAPS) against participants in the building and construction industry and have been heard by the courts since January 2003. I remind the Member for Vasse that the department does not have access to official WAPS records and some particulars of the prosecutions are unknown. Therefore, I am unable to provide a complete response to the Member's question or confirm that the three prosecutions identified by the department constitute the total number of prosecutions undertaken by the WAPS. As previously stated by my predecessor, questions relating to more comprehensive details should be directed to the Minister for Police. The identified details of the three matters before the courts since January 2003 that I am aware of are:
Prosecution 1
(a) July 2002.
(b) Joseph McDonald.
(c) Threats to Influence.
(d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006.
(e) Not applicable.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation.
(g) Unknown.
Prosecution 2
(a) November 2002.
(b) Joseph McDonald.
(c) Common Assault.
(d) Guilty Verdict.
(e) $800 fine and $243 costs.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation.
(g) Unknown.
Prosecution 3
(a) November 2002.
(b) Campbell McCullough.
(c) Common Assault.
(d) Guilty Verdict.
(e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation.
(g) Unknown.
Prosecution 1
(a) July 2002.
(b) Joseph McDonald.
(c) Threats to Influence.
(d) Hearing before the Perth Court of Petty Sessions 20 -22 March 2006.
(e) Not applicable.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation.
(g) Unknown.
Prosecution 2
(a) November 2002.
(b) Joseph McDonald.
(c) Common Assault.
(d) Guilty Verdict.
(e) $800 fine and $243 costs.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation.
(g) Unknown.
Prosecution 3
(a) November 2002.
(b) Campbell McCullough.
(c) Common Assault.
(d) Guilty Verdict.
(e) $500 fine, $243 costs and granted a spent conviction.
(f) No, however, BISPI and WAPS liaised in respect to the investigation.
(g) Unknown.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.