❓ A WA parliamentary question addresses construction proceeding despite a pending native title application. The Minister clarifies approvals under State law and addresses potential remediation and compensation if a permanent injunction is granted.
AnsweredQoN 3029Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) has the application been determined as yet; (c) if so, what was the outcome; (d) if not, why is construction work proceeding prior to the outcome being known; and (e) if the application is successful, will the Minister take action to ensure the site is properly remediated and what amount of compensation is expected to be required?
(c) if so, what was the outcome; (d) if not, why is construction work proceeding prior to the outcome being known; and (e) if the application is successful, will the Minister take action to ensure the site is properly remediated and what amount of compensation is expected to be required?
(d) if not, why is construction work proceeding prior to the outcome being known; and (e) if the application is successful, will the Minister take action to ensure the site is properly remediated and what amount of compensation is expected to be required?
(e) if the application is successful, will the Minister take action to ensure the site is properly remediated and what amount of compensation is expected to be required?
(b)-(c) Based on the application and information presented, the Federal Minister Dr Kemp decided in November 2003 not to grant a temporary injunction under Section 9 of the Act. No decision has been made under Section 10 of the Act on a permanent injunction. (d) Works are proceeding in accordance with the approvals granted under the State Act. At no stage has the Federal Government sought to stop the works. (e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(b)-(c) Based on the application and information presented, the Federal Minister Dr Kemp decided in November 2003 not to grant a temporary injunction under Section 9 of the Act. No decision has been made under Section 10 of the Act on a permanent injunction. (d) Works are proceeding in accordance with the approvals granted under the State Act. At no stage has the Federal Government sought to stop the works. (e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(d) Works are proceeding in accordance with the approvals granted under the State Act. At no stage has the Federal Government sought to stop the works. (e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(d) Works are proceeding in accordance with the approvals granted under the State Act. At no stage has the Federal Government sought to stop the works. (e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(c) if so, what was the outcome; (d) if not, why is construction work proceeding prior to the outcome being known; and (e) if the application is successful, will the Minister take action to ensure the site is properly remediated and what amount of compensation is expected to be required?
(d) if not, why is construction work proceeding prior to the outcome being known; and (e) if the application is successful, will the Minister take action to ensure the site is properly remediated and what amount of compensation is expected to be required?
(e) if the application is successful, will the Minister take action to ensure the site is properly remediated and what amount of compensation is expected to be required?
(b)-(c) Based on the application and information presented, the Federal Minister Dr Kemp decided in November 2003 not to grant a temporary injunction under Section 9 of the Act. No decision has been made under Section 10 of the Act on a permanent injunction. (d) Works are proceeding in accordance with the approvals granted under the State Act. At no stage has the Federal Government sought to stop the works. (e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(b)-(c) Based on the application and information presented, the Federal Minister Dr Kemp decided in November 2003 not to grant a temporary injunction under Section 9 of the Act. No decision has been made under Section 10 of the Act on a permanent injunction. (d) Works are proceeding in accordance with the approvals granted under the State Act. At no stage has the Federal Government sought to stop the works. (e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(d) Works are proceeding in accordance with the approvals granted under the State Act. At no stage has the Federal Government sought to stop the works. (e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(d) Works are proceeding in accordance with the approvals granted under the State Act. At no stage has the Federal Government sought to stop the works. (e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
26 August 2004
Responded by
Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
56 days
(a) Yes an application was made by the Combined Swan River and Swan Coastal Plains Native Title Claimants in July 2003.
(b)-(c) Based on the application and information presented, the Federal Minister Dr Kemp decided in November 2003 not to grant a temporary injunction under Section 9 of the Act. No decision has been made under Section 10 of the Act on a permanent injunction.
(d) Works are proceeding in accordance with the approvals granted under the State Act. At no stage has the Federal Government sought to stop the works.
(e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
(b)-(c) Based on the application and information presented, the Federal Minister Dr Kemp decided in November 2003 not to grant a temporary injunction under Section 9 of the Act. No decision has been made under Section 10 of the Act on a permanent injunction.
(d) Works are proceeding in accordance with the approvals granted under the State Act. At no stage has the Federal Government sought to stop the works.
(e) Appropriate action would be considered should the Federal Minister grant a permanent injunction. No compensation is expected.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.