❓ Question regarding a lost or stolen mobile phone from the Department of Local Government and Regional Development, specifically whether the IMEI was reported and the replacement cost. The answer confirms the IMEI was reported and the replacement cost was $542.43.
AnsweredQoN 2627Legislative Assembly
Asked
2 March 2004
Member
Portfolio
Local Government and Regional Development; the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne; Goldfields-Esperance
QuestionView source ↗
(b) was the IMEI or serial number of the lost or stolen mobile telephone reported to the service provider so that the handset could be blocked from use; (c) if not, why not; and (d) what is the cost of replacing the lost or stolen mobile telephone handsets?
(c) if not, why not; and (d) what is the cost of replacing the lost or stolen mobile telephone handsets?
(d) what is the cost of replacing the lost or stolen mobile telephone handsets?
(a) – (b) Yes. Telstra’s government team were advised and assisted by arranging for the disconnection and disabling of the service. (c) N/A (d) As previously advised, $542.43 Department of Local Government and Regional Development the Kimberley, Pilbara, Gascoyne and Goldfields-Esperance Development Commissions (a) – (d) N/A
Department of Local Government and Regional Development the Kimberley, Pilbara, Gascoyne and Goldfields-Esperance Development Commissions (a) – (d) N/A
(a) – (d) N/A
(c) if not, why not; and (d) what is the cost of replacing the lost or stolen mobile telephone handsets?
(d) what is the cost of replacing the lost or stolen mobile telephone handsets?
(a) – (b) Yes. Telstra’s government team were advised and assisted by arranging for the disconnection and disabling of the service. (c) N/A (d) As previously advised, $542.43 Department of Local Government and Regional Development the Kimberley, Pilbara, Gascoyne and Goldfields-Esperance Development Commissions (a) – (d) N/A
Department of Local Government and Regional Development the Kimberley, Pilbara, Gascoyne and Goldfields-Esperance Development Commissions (a) – (d) N/A
(a) – (d) N/A
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
30 March 2004
Responded by
Minister representing the Minister for Local Government and Regional Development; the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne; Goldfields-Esperance
Response time
28 days
Ministerial Office
(a) – (b) Yes. Telstra’s government team were advised and assisted by arranging for the disconnection and disabling of the service.
(c) N/A
(d) As previously advised, $542.43
Department of Local Government and Regional Development
the Kimberley, Pilbara, Gascoyne and Goldfields-Esperance Development Commissions
(a) – (d) N/A
(a) – (b) Yes. Telstra’s government team were advised and assisted by arranging for the disconnection and disabling of the service.
(c) N/A
(d) As previously advised, $542.43
Department of Local Government and Regional Development
the Kimberley, Pilbara, Gascoyne and Goldfields-Esperance Development Commissions
(a) – (d) N/A
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.