❓ A member of parliament is questioning the Minister for Education about a review of the Western Australian College of Teaching Act. The Minister provides dates for the commissioning and receipt of the review, but states the findings are cabinet-in-confidence, while indicating the review will be tabled 'in due course'.
AnsweredQoN 730Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN COLLEGE OF TEACHING ACT — REVIEW
(1) When did the minister commission the Department of Education Services to review the Western Australian College of Teaching Act? (2) When did the minister receive the department’s review? (3) What were the key recommendations of the review? (4) Will the minister table a copy of the review? Hon PETER COLLIER
(1) When did the minister commission the Department of Education Services to review the Western Australian College of Teaching Act? (2) When did the minister receive the department’s review? (3) What were the key recommendations of the review? (4) Will the minister table a copy of the review? Hon PETER COLLIER
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(2) When did the minister receive the department’s review? (3) What were the key recommendations of the review? (4) Will the minister table a copy of the review? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(3) What were the key recommendations of the review? (4) Will the minister table a copy of the review? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(4) Will the minister table a copy of the review? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(4) Yes, in due course.
(2) When did the minister receive the department’s review? (3) What were the key recommendations of the review? (4) Will the minister table a copy of the review? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(3) What were the key recommendations of the review? (4) Will the minister table a copy of the review? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(4) Will the minister table a copy of the review? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(1) November 2008. (2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(2) June 2010. (3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(3) The findings of the review are cabinet-in-confidence. (4) Yes, in due course.
(4) Yes, in due course.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.