❓ A Western Australian parliamentary Question on Notice (QoN 1472) from May 2002 addresses the Minister for Health regarding contact with a company that produced radioactive waste, following up on a previous question. The Minister confirms actions taken and provides dates.
AnsweredQoN 1472Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
NUCLEAR WASTE
With respect to the minister’s answer to my question without notice asked on Wednesday, 10 April - (1) Did the minister ask the Radiological Council to contact the company that produced the radioactive waste? (2) If yes, when did the minister contact the council? (3) If no, why not? (4) If the minister asked the Radiological Council to contact the company, has the council contacted the company that produced the radioactive waste? (5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
With respect to the minister’s answer to my question without notice asked on Wednesday, 10 April - (1) Did the minister ask the Radiological Council to contact the company that produced the radioactive waste? (2) If yes, when did the minister contact the council? (3) If no, why not? (4) If the minister asked the Radiological Council to contact the company, has the council contacted the company that produced the radioactive waste? (5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
AnswerView source ↗
(1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(1) Did the minister ask the Radiological Council to contact the company that produced the radioactive waste? (2) If yes, when did the minister contact the council? (3) If no, why not? (4) If the minister asked the Radiological Council to contact the company, has the council contacted the company that produced the radioactive waste? (5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(2) If yes, when did the minister contact the council? (3) If no, why not? (4) If the minister asked the Radiological Council to contact the company, has the council contacted the company that produced the radioactive waste? (5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(3) If no, why not? (4) If the minister asked the Radiological Council to contact the company, has the council contacted the company that produced the radioactive waste? (5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(4) If the minister asked the Radiological Council to contact the company, has the council contacted the company that produced the radioactive waste? (5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(10) 30 May 2002.
(1) Did the minister ask the Radiological Council to contact the company that produced the radioactive waste? (2) If yes, when did the minister contact the council? (3) If no, why not? (4) If the minister asked the Radiological Council to contact the company, has the council contacted the company that produced the radioactive waste? (5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(2) If yes, when did the minister contact the council? (3) If no, why not? (4) If the minister asked the Radiological Council to contact the company, has the council contacted the company that produced the radioactive waste? (5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(3) If no, why not? (4) If the minister asked the Radiological Council to contact the company, has the council contacted the company that produced the radioactive waste? (5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(4) If the minister asked the Radiological Council to contact the company, has the council contacted the company that produced the radioactive waste? (5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(5) If it has contacted the company, when was that? (6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(6) If it has not, why not? (7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(7) If it has contacted the company, has the company responded to the council? (8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(8) If the company has responded, what did it say? (9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(9) Will the minister table the response? (10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(10) If the company has not responded, by what date is the minister expecting a response? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(1) Yes. (2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(2) The letter was written on 11 April 2002. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(4) Yes. (5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(5) The letter was written 26 April 2002. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(7) No. (8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(8)-(9) Not applicable. (10) 30 May 2002.
(10) 30 May 2002.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.