❓ Question regarding potential conflicts of interest within the Gender Reassignment Board (GRB) and its members referring applicants to their own practices. The Attorney General denies direct referrals and outlines conflict of interest policies.
AnsweredQoN 1324Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to concerns raised by my constituents about potential conflicts of interests in the operations of the Gender Reassignment Board (GRB), and I ask: (a) do members of the GRB refer applicants for a Gender Recognition Certificate to their own clinical practices for assessment; (b) if yes to (a), are applicants advised that their applications are more likely to be successful if they attend one of GRB members practices; (c) are policies and procedures in place to mitigate potential and actual conflicts of interest on the GRB; and (d) if yes to (c), will the Minister please table the relevant documents?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
21 August 2018
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Attorney General
Response time
9 days
(a) No. The Gender Reassignment Board (the Board) and individual members do not refer applicants to their own clinical practices. The Board does not refer any applicant to anyone for assessment. The Board receives information supplied by applicants. The information is by report, by letter or in person, from a number of sources including clinicians. The information is usually directed to the criteria under the Gender Reassignment Act 2000 . Where a deficiency in the information is identified so as to make it likely that an application may not be granted, the Registrar, at the direction of the President, will write to the applicant asking that they supply the necessary further information from the persons, including clinicians, who have written in support.
(b) Not required.
(c) There is a policy in place that any Board member, including a clinician, who has been involved in an applicant’s case, does not take part in the decision making on that application. The procedure is to apply that policy in such a case. The policy is an application of the rules of procedural fairness. This policy is not written.
(d) Not applicable.
(b) Not required.
(c) There is a policy in place that any Board member, including a clinician, who has been involved in an applicant’s case, does not take part in the decision making on that application. The procedure is to apply that policy in such a case. The policy is an application of the rules of procedural fairness. This policy is not written.
(d) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.