❓ Question regarding contractual arrangements, costs, and effectiveness of a weigh-in machine managed by Main Roads and Multi-tier. The machine is now decommissioned due to a fault and planned infrastructure changes.
AnsweredQoN 2676Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) what contractual arrangements were made between Main Roads and Multi-tier regarding these changes; (c) did this contact go to tender; (d) if not, why not; (e) on what basis was Multi-tier chosen as the contractor; (f) what experience does Multi-tier have in the area of enhancing the performance of such weigh-in machines; (g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(c) did this contact go to tender; (d) if not, why not; (e) on what basis was Multi-tier chosen as the contractor; (f) what experience does Multi-tier have in the area of enhancing the performance of such weigh-in machines; (g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(d) if not, why not; (e) on what basis was Multi-tier chosen as the contractor; (f) what experience does Multi-tier have in the area of enhancing the performance of such weigh-in machines; (g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(e) on what basis was Multi-tier chosen as the contractor; (f) what experience does Multi-tier have in the area of enhancing the performance of such weigh-in machines; (g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(f) what experience does Multi-tier have in the area of enhancing the performance of such weigh-in machines; (g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(q) if so, at what cost?
b) Multitier was one of four members of a Main Roads Information Technology Panel Contract that was in place at the time. All four were asked to quote on works to enhance the system in 2001. Multitier’s quote was accepted. c) Yes. d) Not applicable. e) They had the requisite skills to undertake the enhancements and their workplan committed to completion of the work within the required timeframe. f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads. g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
c) Yes. d) Not applicable. e) They had the requisite skills to undertake the enhancements and their workplan committed to completion of the work within the required timeframe. f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads. g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
d) Not applicable. e) They had the requisite skills to undertake the enhancements and their workplan committed to completion of the work within the required timeframe. f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads. g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
e) They had the requisite skills to undertake the enhancements and their workplan committed to completion of the work within the required timeframe. f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads. g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads. g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
q) Not applicable.
(c) did this contact go to tender; (d) if not, why not; (e) on what basis was Multi-tier chosen as the contractor; (f) what experience does Multi-tier have in the area of enhancing the performance of such weigh-in machines; (g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(d) if not, why not; (e) on what basis was Multi-tier chosen as the contractor; (f) what experience does Multi-tier have in the area of enhancing the performance of such weigh-in machines; (g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(e) on what basis was Multi-tier chosen as the contractor; (f) what experience does Multi-tier have in the area of enhancing the performance of such weigh-in machines; (g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(f) what experience does Multi-tier have in the area of enhancing the performance of such weigh-in machines; (g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(g) how much has been paid to Multi-tier since the weigh-in machine was signed off from the original tender on 21 November 1997; (h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(h) what has been the total cost of the machine, including purchase price and repairs carried out by Multi-tier; (i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(i) what changes did Multi-tier make to the weigh-in machine; (j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(j) did these changes render the weigh-in machine more or less effective; (k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(k) if less effective, was the machine left in a condition able to function properly, or was it left inoperable; (l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(l) at this point in time, is the weigh-in machine performing the task for which it was purchased, or not; (m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(m) has the machine and it’s data base been de-commissioned; (n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(n) if so, why; (o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(o) how is the weigh-in task now being performed; (p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(p) has any additional equipment been purchased; and (q) if so, at what cost?
(q) if so, at what cost?
b) Multitier was one of four members of a Main Roads Information Technology Panel Contract that was in place at the time. All four were asked to quote on works to enhance the system in 2001. Multitier’s quote was accepted. c) Yes. d) Not applicable. e) They had the requisite skills to undertake the enhancements and their workplan committed to completion of the work within the required timeframe. f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads. g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
c) Yes. d) Not applicable. e) They had the requisite skills to undertake the enhancements and their workplan committed to completion of the work within the required timeframe. f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads. g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
d) Not applicable. e) They had the requisite skills to undertake the enhancements and their workplan committed to completion of the work within the required timeframe. f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads. g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
e) They had the requisite skills to undertake the enhancements and their workplan committed to completion of the work within the required timeframe. f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads. g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads. g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system. h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier. i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
i) Software changes. j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
j) More effective. k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
k) Not applicable. l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
l) No. m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained. n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use. o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area. p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area. q) Not applicable.
q) Not applicable.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
13 May 2004
Responded by
Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
64 days
a) The adjustments (mainly computer software) made by Multitier were minor and were to allow Main Roads to better manage the system.
b) Multitier was one of four members of a Main Roads Information Technology Panel Contract that was in place at the time. All four were asked to quote on works to enhance the system in 2001. Multitier’s quote was accepted.
c) Yes.
d) Not applicable.
e) They had the requisite skills to undertake the enhancements and their workplan committed to completion of the work within the required timeframe.
f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads.
g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system.
h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier.
i) Software changes.
j) More effective.
k) Not applicable.
l) No.
m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained.
n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use.
o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area.
p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area.
q) Not applicable.
b) Multitier was one of four members of a Main Roads Information Technology Panel Contract that was in place at the time. All four were asked to quote on works to enhance the system in 2001. Multitier’s quote was accepted.
c) Yes.
d) Not applicable.
e) They had the requisite skills to undertake the enhancements and their workplan committed to completion of the work within the required timeframe.
f) Multitier had the requisite skills to undertake the software enhancements specified by Main Roads.
g) Multitier has received $31 606 for work associated with the Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system.
h) $368,351 was paid for the WIM system and $31 606 was paid to Multitier.
i) Software changes.
j) More effective.
k) Not applicable.
l) No.
m) The system has been turned off. The database has been retained.
n) One of the four weigh plates ceased to function and, as the system needs to be removed to accommodate a new rail loop at the Fremantle Port, a decision was made to turn it off rather than repair it for only limited further use.
o) Main Roads’ Transport Inspectors undertake random truck weighings in the area.
p) No additional equipment has been specifically purchased for use in this area.
q) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.