Question regarding Homeswest building program projections for 2006-07 and 2007-08. The answer indicates no shortfall in 2006-07 and a projected program of 922 for 2007-08.

AnsweredQoN 243Legislative Council
Asked
3 May 2007
Portfolio
Housing and Works

QuestionView source ↗

HOMESWEST BUILDING PROGRAM - PROJECTIONS
(1) What is the projected shortfall in the Homeswest building program for 2006-07? (2) What are the reasons for the likely shortfall? (3) What is the projected program for 2007-08? (4) Does this projection include making up the 2006-07 shortfall? (5) If not, why not? Hon JON FORD

AnswerView source ↗

I thank Hon Ray Halligan for the question. The minister representing the Minister for Housing and Works has provided the following answer - The Department of Housing and Works advises - (1) Nil. (2) Not applicable. (3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
(2) What are the reasons for the likely shortfall? (3) What is the projected program for 2007-08? (4) Does this projection include making up the 2006-07 shortfall? (5) If not, why not? Hon JON FORD replied: I thank Hon Ray Halligan for the question. The minister representing the Minister for Housing and Works has provided the following answer - The Department of Housing and Works advises - (1) Nil. (2) Not applicable. (3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
(3) What is the projected program for 2007-08? (4) Does this projection include making up the 2006-07 shortfall? (5) If not, why not? Hon JON FORD replied: I thank Hon Ray Halligan for the question. The minister representing the Minister for Housing and Works has provided the following answer - The Department of Housing and Works advises - (1) Nil. (2) Not applicable. (3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
(4) Does this projection include making up the 2006-07 shortfall? (5) If not, why not? Hon JON FORD replied: I thank Hon Ray Halligan for the question. The minister representing the Minister for Housing and Works has provided the following answer - The Department of Housing and Works advises - (1) Nil. (2) Not applicable. (3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
(5) If not, why not? Hon JON FORD replied: I thank Hon Ray Halligan for the question. The minister representing the Minister for Housing and Works has provided the following answer - The Department of Housing and Works advises - (1) Nil. (2) Not applicable. (3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
Hon JON FORD replied: I thank Hon Ray Halligan for the question. The minister representing the Minister for Housing and Works has provided the following answer - The Department of Housing and Works advises - (1) Nil. (2) Not applicable. (3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
I thank Hon Ray Halligan for the question. The minister representing the Minister for Housing and Works has provided the following answer - The Department of Housing and Works advises - (1) Nil. (2) Not applicable. (3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
The Department of Housing and Works advises - (1) Nil. (2) Not applicable. (3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
(1) Nil. (2) Not applicable. (3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
(2) Not applicable. (3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
(3) 922. (4)-(5) Not applicable.
(4)-(5) Not applicable.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more