Hon. Norman Moore asks the Premier about the decision on appeals regarding the Coral Coast Marina Development proposal under the Environmental Protection Act. Hon. Kim Chance replies that the decision was made in letters dated 3 July 2003, which have been tabled.

AnsweredQoN 1394Legislative Council
Asked
22 October 2003
Portfolio
Leader of the House representing the Premier

QuestionView source ↗

I refer the Premier to his requirement to make a decision on the appeals lodged under section 100(2) of the Environmental Protection Act against the Environmental Protection Authority report on the Coral Coast Marina Development proposal. (1) What was the Premier’s decision on the appeals, as opposed to his decision on the proposal itself, announced by the Premier? (2) Did the Premier provide a written decision on the appeals; if not, why not? (3) If there was a written decision on the appeals, will the Premier table that decision; if not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE

AnswerView source ↗

(1)-(2) The Premier’s decision on the appeals was made in terms of letters dated 3 July 2003. (3) The relevant correspondence is tabled. [See paper No 1569.]
(1) What was the Premier’s decision on the appeals, as opposed to his decision on the proposal itself, announced by the Premier? (2) Did the Premier provide a written decision on the appeals; if not, why not? (3) If there was a written decision on the appeals, will the Premier table that decision; if not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied : (1)-(2) The Premier’s decision on the appeals was made in terms of letters dated 3 July 2003. (3) The relevant correspondence is tabled. [See paper No 1569.]
(2) Did the Premier provide a written decision on the appeals; if not, why not? (3) If there was a written decision on the appeals, will the Premier table that decision; if not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied : (1)-(2) The Premier’s decision on the appeals was made in terms of letters dated 3 July 2003. (3) The relevant correspondence is tabled. [See paper No 1569.]
(3) If there was a written decision on the appeals, will the Premier table that decision; if not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied : (1)-(2) The Premier’s decision on the appeals was made in terms of letters dated 3 July 2003. (3) The relevant correspondence is tabled. [See paper No 1569.]
Hon KIM CHANCE replied : (1)-(2) The Premier’s decision on the appeals was made in terms of letters dated 3 July 2003. (3) The relevant correspondence is tabled. [See paper No 1569.]
(1)-(2) The Premier’s decision on the appeals was made in terms of letters dated 3 July 2003. (3) The relevant correspondence is tabled. [See paper No 1569.]
(3) The relevant correspondence is tabled. [See paper No 1569.]
[See paper No 1569.]

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more