❓ Question on Notice regarding the implementation of recommendation 37 from the 'Putting the Public First' Economic Audit Committee report, specifically concerning industrial relations reform. The Premier's office deflects the question to a previous QoN.
AnsweredQoN 3947Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the ‘Putting the Public First’ Economic Audit Committee report of October 2009, and in particular to recommendation 37 which was to, -
‘Pursue the following reform proposals separately in the context of the outcomes of the Amendola review of the industrial relations system -
(a) accelerate the standardisation, simplification and rationalisation of industrial awards currently being pursued by the Department of Treasury and Finance and the Department of Commerce, without disadvantage to existing employees; and
(b) a decentralised service model for industrial relations services, with ongoing advice on the identification and realisation of efficiency and productivity opportunities provided by out-posting Department of Commerce officers within agencies with large occupational groups’,
and I ask -
(1) Has the following milestone, prepare a Cabinet Submission proposing options for reform (June 2010), contained in recommendation 37 been achieved?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
‘Pursue the following reform proposals separately in the context of the outcomes of the Amendola review of the industrial relations system -
(a) accelerate the standardisation, simplification and rationalisation of industrial awards currently being pursued by the Department of Treasury and Finance and the Department of Commerce, without disadvantage to existing employees; and
(b) a decentralised service model for industrial relations services, with ongoing advice on the identification and realisation of efficiency and productivity opportunities provided by out-posting Department of Commerce officers within agencies with large occupational groups’,
and I ask -
(1) Has the following milestone, prepare a Cabinet Submission proposing options for reform (June 2010), contained in recommendation 37 been achieved?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
29 June 2011
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Premier
Response time
42 days
Please refer to Legislative Council Question on Notice 3912.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.