A parliamentary question accuses the Barnett government of devaluing tourism due to budget cuts, or alternatively, devaluing the Minister for Tourism. The Minister's response avoids the question and attacks the questioner's character.

AnsweredQoN 223Legislative Assembly
Asked
11 June 2013
Portfolio
Tourism

QuestionView source ↗

TOURISM WA — BUDGET CUTS
223. Mr P. PAPALIA to the Minister for Tourism:
I have a supplementary question.
Does the 30 per cent cut to the remaining tourism advertising budget indicate
that the Barnett government's cabinet sees tourism as a second-rate
industry, or does it confirm that it sees the Minister for Tourism as a
second-rate minister?

AnswerView source ↗

This member is a serial denigrator.
Look at what he did with every other minister he related to; he told them they
were useless. He told them they were pathetic. He told them they were the worst
ministers in history. Even his tweets denigrated people. He remembers that he
did a specific one about me, which I chatted to him about. He is a serial
denigrator. That is what happens with cyberbullies, and he is one.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more