❓ Hon Barbara Scott asks about a report regarding a proposed secondary school in Mundijong. The Minister confirms a report exists but will not table it, stating it was advice to the minister, and the department did not support the proposal.
AnsweredQoN 741Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the proposal to establish a secondary school in Mundijong. (1) Has a report on the proposal been produced for the minister? (2) If so, will he table the report? (3) If he will not table the report, why not? (4) If no report was produced, on what basis did he reject the request for a secondary school in Mundijong? Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD
AnswerView source ↗
(1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(1) Has a report on the proposal been produced for the minister? (2) If so, will he table the report? (3) If he will not table the report, why not? (4) If no report was produced, on what basis did he reject the request for a secondary school in Mundijong? Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD replied: (1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(2) If so, will he table the report? (3) If he will not table the report, why not? (4) If no report was produced, on what basis did he reject the request for a secondary school in Mundijong? Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD replied: (1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(3) If he will not table the report, why not? (4) If no report was produced, on what basis did he reject the request for a secondary school in Mundijong? Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD replied: (1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(4) If no report was produced, on what basis did he reject the request for a secondary school in Mundijong? Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD replied: (1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD replied: (1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(1) Has a report on the proposal been produced for the minister? (2) If so, will he table the report? (3) If he will not table the report, why not? (4) If no report was produced, on what basis did he reject the request for a secondary school in Mundijong? Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD replied: (1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(2) If so, will he table the report? (3) If he will not table the report, why not? (4) If no report was produced, on what basis did he reject the request for a secondary school in Mundijong? Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD replied: (1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(3) If he will not table the report, why not? (4) If no report was produced, on what basis did he reject the request for a secondary school in Mundijong? Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD replied: (1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(4) If no report was produced, on what basis did he reject the request for a secondary school in Mundijong? Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD replied: (1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
Hon GRAHAM GIFFARD replied: (1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(1) Yes. (2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(2) No. (3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(3) The report was in the form of advice to the minister. (4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
(4) The department recommended that the proposal not be supported.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.