❓ This WA parliamentary question on notice from 2003 seeks data related to a review process, including pending referrals, staffing levels, and prerogative writs. The response provides detailed figures for various periods, with caveats about data collection methods.
AnsweredQoN 1215Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(b) June 30 2001; (c) June 30 2002; and (d) June 30 2003?
(c) June 30 2002; and (d) June 30 2003?
(d) June 30 2003?
(b) June 30 2001; (c) June 30 2002; and (d) June 30 2003?
(c) June 30 2002; and (d) June 30 2003?
(d) June 30 2003?
(c) June 30 2002; and (d) June 30 2003?
(d) June 30 2003?
(b) June 30 2001; (c) June 30 2002; and (d) June 30 2003?
(c) June 30 2002; and (d) June 30 2003?
(d) June 30 2003?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
15 October 2003
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Premier
Response time
36 days
(b) longer than six months; (c) longer than 12 months; (d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(c) longer than 12 months; (d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(e) longer than two or more years?
(b) longer than six months; (c) longer than 12 months; (d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(c) longer than 12 months; (d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(e) longer than two or more years?
(b) insurers?
(b) insurers?
(b) July 31 2001 to January 31 2002?
(b) July 31 2001 to January 31 2002?
(b) September 13 2002 to March 12 2003?
(b) September 13 2002 to March 12 2003?
(b) 653 (c) 683 (d) 733 (2) (a) 24 (b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(c) 683 (d) 733 (2) (a) 24 (b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(d) 733 (2) (a) 24 (b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(2) (a) 24 (b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(2) (a) 24 (b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(c) longer than 12 months; (d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(e) longer than two or more years?
(b) longer than six months; (c) longer than 12 months; (d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(c) longer than 12 months; (d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(d) longer than 18 months; and (e) longer than two or more years?
(e) longer than two or more years?
(b) insurers?
(b) insurers?
(b) July 31 2001 to January 31 2002?
(b) July 31 2001 to January 31 2002?
(b) September 13 2002 to March 12 2003?
(b) September 13 2002 to March 12 2003?
(b) 653 (c) 683 (d) 733 (2) (a) 24 (b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(c) 683 (d) 733 (2) (a) 24 (b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(d) 733 (2) (a) 24 (b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(2) (a) 24 (b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(2) (a) 24 (b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 247 (c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(c) 342 (d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(d) 393 (3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(3) Yes (4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(4) Two full-time and 2 at .5 each (3 FTE) (5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(5) (a) 111 (b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 118 (c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(c) 60 (d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(d) 22 (e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(e) 98 (The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(The above figures represent the number of referrals pending the review process as at 16.9.03). (6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(6) (a) 4 (b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 2 (c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(c) Nil (d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(d) Nil (e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(e) Nil (7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(7) For the year ended 30.06.02 For the year ended 30.06.03 (a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(a) 0 (a) 4 (b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 1 (b) 3 (Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(Specific statistical data is not maintained for this information, and the response provided is based upon the best recollection of the individual review officers. An examination of all files would be necessary to provide any greater level of detail). (8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(8) (a) 10 (b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 171 (The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(The above figures comprise the number of prerogative writs where copies have been served on the Director). (9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(9) No (10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(10) None (There is no power for a review officer to exercise summary jurisdiction. Parties are given the opportunity to be heard on this issue). (11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(11) (a) 414 (b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 242 (12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(12) (a) 170 (b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 165 (13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(13) (a) 188 (b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 154 (14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(14) (a) 194 (b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(b) 229 (15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
(15) None (There is no power for a review officer to dismiss a referral on his/her own motion).
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.