A WA parliamentary question sought to identify agencies under the Attorney General's portfolio that provided unsatisfactory financial documents to the Auditor General, leading to increased audit costs and potential delays in annual report tabling. The Attorney General's response indicated that none of the listed agencies were identified as having provided unsatisfactory documents.

AnsweredQoN 3298Legislative Council
Asked
15 February 2011
Portfolio
Attorney General

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the WA Auditor General Audit Results Report Annual 2009-10 Assurance Audits Report 10 Nov 2010, in section five ‘Quality and Timeliness of Financial Reporting’ on page 30 where it refers to too many Agencies providing documents of unsatisfactory quality, causing audit costs to rise, often significantly, which can delay the issuing of the opinion and the tabling of the annual report, and I ask -
(1) What are the Agencies under the Minister’s portfolio that the audit is referring to?
(2) Have any Annual Reports of these agencies been delayed because of the unsatisfactory quality of their documents for audit?
(3) What action has been taken to ensure these Agencies are able to improve their financial statements for audit?
(4) Can the Minister give an assurance that these Agencies will implement better quality control processes to improve the material they submit in time for the next audit?
(5) If no to (4), why not?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
21 March 2011
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Attorney General
Response time
34 days
COMMISSIONER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE
(1) CCYP is not one of those agencies who provided documents of unsatisfactory quality to the Auditor General.
(2) - (5) Not Applicable
CORRUPTION AND CRIME COMMISSION
(1) The CCC is not one of the agencies referred to on page 30 of the WA Auditor general Audit Results Report Annual 2009-10 Assurance Audits Report, 10 November 2010.
(2)  - (5) Not Applicable
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(1) - (5) Not Applicable
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
(1) - (5) Not Applicable
LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
(1) The Law Reform Commission is not referred to in the audit.
(2) - (5) Not Applicable
LEGAL AID COMMISSION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
(1) - (5) Not Applicable
LEGAL PRACTICE BOARD OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
(1) The Board submitted its properly audited Annual Report on accordance with the Department's directives.
(2) - (5) Not Applicable
LEGAL PROFESSION COMPLAINTS COMMITTEE
(1) - (5) Not applicable as the Legal Profession Complaints Committee is not an agency which submits documents to the Auditor General as the audit of its business is undertaken by the Legal Practice Board.
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
(1) There were no significant issues surrounding the 2009-10 Audit of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for Western Australia.
(2) - (5) Not Applicable
OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
(1) The OIC has received no negative feedback from OAG regarding its financial reports.
(2) No, the OIC's annual report was tabled within the required timeframe.
(3) - (5) Not Applicable
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more