❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks details about the proposed Finbar development on the former Port Hedland Hospital site, including land usage, ownership, valuation, environmental concerns, and sales negotiations with LandCorp.
AnsweredQoN 991Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
According to the Australian Business
Journal of 21 January 2014, Finbar is now finalising
documentation with LandCorp to acquire the former hospital site in Port Hedland with
a view to seek development approval for the first stage of the project,
consisting of 138 residential apartments and 800sqm of commercial space, and I ask: (a) what
proportion of the former Port Hedland Hospital Site of 3.15ha is planned to be
used for this development; (b) if
the answer to (a) is not 100 per cent, please explain why not; (c) what
is the current market value of the property; (d) who
currently owns the site; (e) please
provide details about any transfers of land ownership that have taken place
since the hospital closure; (f) is
it proposed to transfer the ownership of the land to Finbar Group Limited; (g) if
yes to (f), what is the agreed or discussed price for the property; (h) if
no to (f), is the Department for Planning or Landcorp involved in any sales negotiations; (i) if
yes to (h), please provide details about the parties involved in the
negotiations; (j) if the answer to (g) is different from the
answer to (c), please explain why; (k) what
environmental concerns have been raised regarding the future development of the
site and by whom; and (l) how
are the concerns under (k) addressed in the amended proposal?
Journal of 21 January 2014, Finbar is now finalising
documentation with LandCorp to acquire the former hospital site in Port Hedland with
a view to seek development approval for the first stage of the project,
consisting of 138 residential apartments and 800sqm of commercial space, and I ask: (a) what
proportion of the former Port Hedland Hospital Site of 3.15ha is planned to be
used for this development; (b) if
the answer to (a) is not 100 per cent, please explain why not; (c) what
is the current market value of the property; (d) who
currently owns the site; (e) please
provide details about any transfers of land ownership that have taken place
since the hospital closure; (f) is
it proposed to transfer the ownership of the land to Finbar Group Limited; (g) if
yes to (f), what is the agreed or discussed price for the property; (h) if
no to (f), is the Department for Planning or Landcorp involved in any sales negotiations; (i) if
yes to (h), please provide details about the parties involved in the
negotiations; (j) if the answer to (g) is different from the
answer to (c), please explain why; (k) what
environmental concerns have been raised regarding the future development of the
site and by whom; and (l) how
are the concerns under (k) addressed in the amended proposal?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
13 May 2014
Responded by
Minister for Mental Health representing the Minister for Planning
Response time
42 days
(a)
- (l) Please refer to Legislative Council Question on Notice 990
- (l) Please refer to Legislative Council Question on Notice 990
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.