❓ Question regarding the rejection of Mr. Norman Echo's Stolen Wages Reparation Scheme application and broader concerns about the scheme's fairness and scope, followed by a request for a committee of inquiry which was denied.
AnsweredQoN 352Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
With regard to the Stolen Wages Reparation Scheme Western Australia, I ask: (a) is the Minister aware of the claim of Mr Norman Echo from the Warmun Community in the Kimberley, whose application to the Stolen Wages Reparation Scheme Western Australia was refused because "Bedford Downs Station, Springvale Station and Ruby Plains Station are not institutions or facilities within the scope of the Reparation Scheme"; (b) is the Minister also aware that Mr Echo worked on these stations for many years from the age of fifteen or sixteen and was not paid by any of them; (c) is the Minister further aware that Mr Echo applied for a review of the decision and that this was refused; (d) is the Minister aware that many Aboriginal people consider the Stolen Wages Reparation Scheme Western Australia to be unfair as they contend that non-payment of wages occurred as a direct consequence of State Government policy, regardless of where they worked, and that therefore the State Government should apologise and make amends to all Aboriginal people who were affected; (e) will the Minister establish a committee of inquiry to examine all aspects of the scheme; and (f) if no to (e), why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
19 November 2013
Responded by
Minister for Aboriginal Affairs
Response time
35 days
(a) Yes.
(b) I am aware of the statements made by Mr Echo in his application to the Stolen Wages Reparation Scheme.
(c) Yes.
(d) Yes.
(e) No.
(f) The State Government's response to the issue of stolen wages was largely based on advice from the Stolen Wages Taskforce, which found that station workers' incomes were not controlled directly by Government and consequently, fall outside the scope of the Scheme.
(b) I am aware of the statements made by Mr Echo in his application to the Stolen Wages Reparation Scheme.
(c) Yes.
(d) Yes.
(e) No.
(f) The State Government's response to the issue of stolen wages was largely based on advice from the Stolen Wages Taskforce, which found that station workers' incomes were not controlled directly by Government and consequently, fall outside the scope of the Scheme.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.