Question regarding the assessment, timeline, costs, and funding of a rail option for transporting lithium ore from the Greenbushes mine, and alternative road upgrades if rail is not pursued. The government is awaiting further reports before making a decision.

AnsweredQoN 5340Legislative Assembly
Asked
7 August 2019
Portfolio
Transport; Planning

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to consideration by government of a rail option for transporting ore from the Greenbushes lithium mine to various destinations, and ask: (a) What work has been/is being done to assess the merits of a rail option for lithium ore transport from the Greenbushes mine; (b) Will the Minister table any reports, studies or business cases relevant to this assessment; (c) Will the Minister outline the timeline for any government decisions in regard to a rail option; (d) Will the Minister outline the likely costs of a rail option and the funding sources from which it is likely to be financed; and (e) If a rail option is not to be considered, will the Minister invest in road upgrades, in an endeavour to manage the significant increase in truck traffic as a result of mine expansions: (i) If yes, what has the Minister allocated to road upgrades and over what timeframe?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
17 September 2019
Responded by
Minister for Transport; Planning
Response time
11 days
(a)-(d) The Transport Portfolio is currently awaiting outcomes of work by Arc Infrastructure including the second stage of pre-feasibility work and the business case. A decision will be made following this process.
(e) Main Roads has been progressively upgrading the South Western Highway independently of the Greenbushes lithium mine proposal. Approximately $18.4 million has been spent upgrading the South Western Highway over the last four years.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more