This parliamentary question seeks information on heritage listings in WA, specifically regarding recommendations made by the Heritage Council, decisions made by the Minister, and owner support/objection to listings. It also requests numerical data related to heritage entries.

AnsweredQoN 2199Legislative Assembly
Asked
8 May 2007
Portfolio
Heritage

QuestionView source ↗

(b) rejected; and (c) successfully listed?
(c) successfully listed?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
12 June 2007
Responded by
Minister for Heritage
Response time
35 days
(1) (a) The Heritage Council made no recommendations to the Minister for new entries and recommended 1 existing entry be made permanent in the State Register. (b) The Minister for Heritage declined 0 recommendations for new entries in the Register. (c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 4 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1213 (3) Nil (4) 74 (5) 6 (6) Proposals No recommendations were made by the Heritage Council for new entries in the State Register. The owner of the one place proposed for permanent entry in the Register supported listing. Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(b) The Minister for Heritage declined 0 recommendations for new entries in the Register. (c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 4 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1213 (3) Nil (4) 74 (5) 6 (6) Proposals No recommendations were made by the Heritage Council for new entries in the State Register. The owner of the one place proposed for permanent entry in the Register supported listing. Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 4 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1213 (3) Nil (4) 74 (5) 6 (6) Proposals No recommendations were made by the Heritage Council for new entries in the State Register. The owner of the one place proposed for permanent entry in the Register supported listing. Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(2) 1213 (3) Nil (4) 74 (5) 6 (6) Proposals No recommendations were made by the Heritage Council for new entries in the State Register. The owner of the one place proposed for permanent entry in the Register supported listing. Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(3) Nil (4) 74 (5) 6 (6) Proposals No recommendations were made by the Heritage Council for new entries in the State Register. The owner of the one place proposed for permanent entry in the Register supported listing. Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(4) 74 (5) 6 (6) Proposals No recommendations were made by the Heritage Council for new entries in the State Register. The owner of the one place proposed for permanent entry in the Register supported listing. Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(5) 6 (6) Proposals No recommendations were made by the Heritage Council for new entries in the State Register. The owner of the one place proposed for permanent entry in the Register supported listing. Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(6) Proposals No recommendations were made by the Heritage Council for new entries in the State Register. The owner of the one place proposed for permanent entry in the Register supported listing. Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
No recommendations were made by the Heritage Council for new entries in the State Register. The owner of the one place proposed for permanent entry in the Register supported listing. Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
The owner of the one place proposed for permanent entry in the Register supported listing. Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
Entries The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
The owners of two new places entered in the Register supported listing. The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
The owner of one of the four places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more