A parliamentary question regarding the Attorney General's incomplete response to a previous question. The representing minister provides further information, seemingly addressing the omissions.

AnsweredQoN 1379Legislative Council
Asked
21 October 2003
Portfolio
minister representing the Attorney General

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the Attorney General’s answer to question without notice 1011. The answer provided by the Attorney General avoided dealing with parts (2)(b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g). (1) Was this failure to deal with those parts - (a) an inadvertent omission on the part of Attorney General; (b) a purposeful evasion by the Attorney General; or (c) the result of some other reason; and if so, what? (2) Will the Attorney General now provide to the Parliament and the public information about his behaviour as Attorney General, as requested in the earlier question? (3) If not, how does he reconcile this refusal with the Government’s claim to provide the highest standard of openness and accountability? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am glad Hon Barry House did not get the jump on him again. The Attorney General has provided the following response, and I am satisfied that it is provided by the Attorney General. I have had only a few moments to look at it, but I am satisfied that it is his response. (1)-(3) To the extent the member believes the answer to question without notice 1011 was not complete, the Attorney General provides the following further information - 2 (a) All. (b) Within days of receiving it (c) I did. (d) No one. (e) No. (f) Yes, by Alison Fan of Channel 7 (g) Self evident
(1) Was this failure to deal with those parts - (a) an inadvertent omission on the part of Attorney General; (b) a purposeful evasion by the Attorney General; or (c) the result of some other reason; and if so, what? (2) Will the Attorney General now provide to the Parliament and the public information about his behaviour as Attorney General, as requested in the earlier question? (3) If not, how does he reconcile this refusal with the Government’s claim to provide the highest standard of openness and accountability? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am glad Hon Barry House did not get the jump on him again. The Attorney General has provided the following response, and I am satisfied that it is provided by the Attorney General. I have had only a few moments to look at it, but I am satisfied that it is his response. (1)-(3) To the extent the member believes the answer to question without notice 1011 was not complete, the Attorney General provides the following further information - 2 (a) All. (b) Within days of receiving it (c) I did. (d) No one. (e) No. (f) Yes, by Alison Fan of Channel 7 (g) Self evident
(b) a purposeful evasion by the Attorney General; or (c) the result of some other reason; and if so, what?
(c) the result of some other reason; and if so, what?
(3) If not, how does he reconcile this refusal with the Government’s claim to provide the highest standard of openness and accountability? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am glad Hon Barry House did not get the jump on him again. The Attorney General has provided the following response, and I am satisfied that it is provided by the Attorney General. I have had only a few moments to look at it, but I am satisfied that it is his response. (1)-(3) To the extent the member believes the answer to question without notice 1011 was not complete, the Attorney General provides the following further information - 2 (a) All. (b) Within days of receiving it (c) I did. (d) No one. (e) No. (f) Yes, by Alison Fan of Channel 7 (g) Self evident
Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am glad Hon Barry House did not get the jump on him again. The Attorney General has provided the following response, and I am satisfied that it is provided by the Attorney General. I have had only a few moments to look at it, but I am satisfied that it is his response. (1)-(3) To the extent the member believes the answer to question without notice 1011 was not complete, the Attorney General provides the following further information - 2 (a) All. (b) Within days of receiving it (c) I did. (d) No one. (e) No. (f) Yes, by Alison Fan of Channel 7 (g) Self evident
I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am glad Hon Barry House did not get the jump on him again. The Attorney General has provided the following response, and I am satisfied that it is provided by the Attorney General. I have had only a few moments to look at it, but I am satisfied that it is his response. (1)-(3) To the extent the member believes the answer to question without notice 1011 was not complete, the Attorney General provides the following further information - 2 (a) All. (b) Within days of receiving it (c) I did. (d) No one. (e) No. (f) Yes, by Alison Fan of Channel 7 (g) Self evident
(1)-(3) To the extent the member believes the answer to question without notice 1011 was not complete, the Attorney General provides the following further information - 2 (a) All. (b) Within days of receiving it (c) I did. (d) No one. (e) No. (f) Yes, by Alison Fan of Channel 7 (g) Self evident
(c) I did. (d) No one. (e) No. (f) Yes, by Alison Fan of Channel 7 (g) Self evident
(d) No one. (e) No. (f) Yes, by Alison Fan of Channel 7 (g) Self evident
(e) No. (f) Yes, by Alison Fan of Channel 7 (g) Self evident
(f) Yes, by Alison Fan of Channel 7 (g) Self evident
(g) Self evident

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more