❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice inquires about the implementation of recommendations from a 1997 study regarding Leach Highway signal operations, advisory speed systems, and grade separation at the Stock Road intersection. The Minister's response indicates partial implementation and future review.
AnsweredQoN 47Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Has Main Roads WA implemented optimal signal coordination for all traffic lights along the whole length of Leach Highway as recommended in the 1997 study by ARRB, Evaluation of Leach Highway Signal Operations for Improving the Level of Service for Trucks?
(2) If yes, when was this completed?
(3) Did the study recommend that an advisory speed system be installed along Leach Highway?
(4) Has this system been installed?
(5) Did the study recommend grade separation at the Stock Road/Leach Highway intersection to improve traffic management?
(6) Has Main Roads WA developed any plans for this recommendation since the completion of the study in 1997?
(7) If yes, will the Minister table those plans?
(2) If yes, when was this completed?
(3) Did the study recommend that an advisory speed system be installed along Leach Highway?
(4) Has this system been installed?
(5) Did the study recommend grade separation at the Stock Road/Leach Highway intersection to improve traffic management?
(6) Has Main Roads WA developed any plans for this recommendation since the completion of the study in 1997?
(7) If yes, will the Minister table those plans?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
26 June 2001
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
27 days
(2) September 1998. (3) No. However, the report's conclusions listed a number of short and long term options suitable for future implementation, one of which was 'advisory speed systems'. (4) No. (5) No. The final report made a preliminary recommendation that grade separation be provided at the Stock Road/Leach Highway intersection but it was not one of the report's final recommendations. (6) No. (7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
(3) No. However, the report's conclusions listed a number of short and long term options suitable for future implementation, one of which was 'advisory speed systems'. (4) No. (5) No. The final report made a preliminary recommendation that grade separation be provided at the Stock Road/Leach Highway intersection but it was not one of the report's final recommendations. (6) No. (7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
(4) No. (5) No. The final report made a preliminary recommendation that grade separation be provided at the Stock Road/Leach Highway intersection but it was not one of the report's final recommendations. (6) No. (7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
(5) No. The final report made a preliminary recommendation that grade separation be provided at the Stock Road/Leach Highway intersection but it was not one of the report's final recommendations. (6) No. (7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
(6) No. (7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
(7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
(3) No. However, the report's conclusions listed a number of short and long term options suitable for future implementation, one of which was 'advisory speed systems'. (4) No. (5) No. The final report made a preliminary recommendation that grade separation be provided at the Stock Road/Leach Highway intersection but it was not one of the report's final recommendations. (6) No. (7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
(4) No. (5) No. The final report made a preliminary recommendation that grade separation be provided at the Stock Road/Leach Highway intersection but it was not one of the report's final recommendations. (6) No. (7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
(5) No. The final report made a preliminary recommendation that grade separation be provided at the Stock Road/Leach Highway intersection but it was not one of the report's final recommendations. (6) No. (7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
(6) No. (7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
(7) Not applicable. All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
All of these issues will be examined as part of the Metropolitan Freight Review in the second half of this year.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.