❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding Esperance Senior High School's student population, demountable classrooms, and the denial of approval for a private Anglican secondary school. The Minister provides factual answers and explains the legal reasons for the denial.
AnsweredQoN 368Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
ESPERANCE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
(1) How many students attend the Esperance Senior High School? (2) How many demountable classrooms are located at the Esperance Senior High School for classroom teaching? (3) Will the minister please explain why she will not give approval for the establishment of a private Anglican secondary school at Esperance; and, if not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
(1) How many students attend the Esperance Senior High School? (2) How many demountable classrooms are located at the Esperance Senior High School for classroom teaching? (3) Will the minister please explain why she will not give approval for the establishment of a private Anglican secondary school at Esperance; and, if not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
(2) How many demountable classrooms are located at the Esperance Senior High School for classroom teaching? (3) Will the minister please explain why she will not give approval for the establishment of a private Anglican secondary school at Esperance; and, if not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
(3) Will the minister please explain why she will not give approval for the establishment of a private Anglican secondary school at Esperance; and, if not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
(1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
(2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
(3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
(2) How many demountable classrooms are located at the Esperance Senior High School for classroom teaching? (3) Will the minister please explain why she will not give approval for the establishment of a private Anglican secondary school at Esperance; and, if not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
(3) Will the minister please explain why she will not give approval for the establishment of a private Anglican secondary school at Esperance; and, if not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
(1) One thousand and thirteen. (2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
(2) Fifteen. Most will be removed in the early part of semester two this year upon the completion of the new $7.5 million middle school building. (3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
(3) The application for the proposed school did not satisfy the legal framework for the approval of new non-government schools contained in the School Education Act 1999 and the School Education Regulations 2000, which deal with the impact that a proposal would have on the educational programs at existing schools, growth of the student population in the catchment area and the likely number of students to attend the proposed school.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.