❓ The Premier addresses parliamentary accommodation inadequacies and the expiring lease of Governor Stirling Tower. The government is considering constructing a new government building within the parliamentary precinct as a long-term solution.
AnsweredQoN 966Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
PARLIAMENTARY PRECINCT — FUTURE ACCOMMODATION NEEDS
Since I have been elected to this Parliament I have become aware that the buildings and facilities within the parliamentary precinct do not adequately cater for the roles and functions of Parliament, especially for committees and support services. I am also aware of the limitations and rising rental costs in the central business district, where a number of government offices and agencies are located. Can the Premier please update the house on what the government is doing about the future accommodation needs of the Parliament and other government offices? Mr C.J. BARNETT
Since I have been elected to this Parliament I have become aware that the buildings and facilities within the parliamentary precinct do not adequately cater for the roles and functions of Parliament, especially for committees and support services. I am also aware of the limitations and rising rental costs in the central business district, where a number of government offices and agencies are located. Can the Premier please update the house on what the government is doing about the future accommodation needs of the Parliament and other government offices? Mr C.J. BARNETT
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for Nedlands for the question. I will answer the second part first. The lease on Governor Stirling Tower, which is the main accommodation for government and which covers the Department of the Premier and Cabinet, the Public Sector Commission, the Department of Treasury and Finance and the Department of Indigenous Affairs, expires in June 2012. Although the government would like to continue that lease, it is understood that the owner of the building is not prepared to do so. We will endeavour to gain some extension, but as it looks at the moment, Governor Stirling Tower will no longer be available after June 2012 as the principal accommodation for my office and the central agencies of the government. Somewhat coincidentally, I received a letter, dated 24 September, from the Speaker and the President raising issues about accommodation for the Parliament. As members are aware, this building, which is more than 100 years old, has its limitations, but it is the Parliament. The issue relates more to committee meeting rooms, areas where hearings are held, ancillary services and the like. Members are broadly aware that in the area of West Perth adjacent to Parliament House there are three properties owned by the Parliament and another three that are leased. Holding six properties in the immediate area is hardly an efficient long-term use of accommodation. They are relatively expensive, and in many cases the buildings are inappropriate—for example, houses that have been converted. That has evolved over the years, and I make no comment on it, but these two factors come together. After discussions with the President and the Speaker, the government has asked the state architect, Mr Steve Woodland, to look at the parliamentary precinct as a whole and consider its future use. I expect that he will consult with not only the office bearers of the Parliament, but also the Leader of the Opposition and other interested members. Mr E.S. Ripper : You want it all fixed before you go back into opposition. Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr C.J. BARNETT replied: I thank the member for Nedlands for the question. I will answer the second part first. The lease on Governor Stirling Tower, which is the main accommodation for government and which covers the Department of the Premier and Cabinet, the Public Sector Commission, the Department of Treasury and Finance and the Department of Indigenous Affairs, expires in June 2012. Although the government would like to continue that lease, it is understood that the owner of the building is not prepared to do so. We will endeavour to gain some extension, but as it looks at the moment, Governor Stirling Tower will no longer be available after June 2012 as the principal accommodation for my office and the central agencies of the government. Somewhat coincidentally, I received a letter, dated 24 September, from the Speaker and the President raising issues about accommodation for the Parliament. As members are aware, this building, which is more than 100 years old, has its limitations, but it is the Parliament. The issue relates more to committee meeting rooms, areas where hearings are held, ancillary services and the like. Members are broadly aware that in the area of West Perth adjacent to Parliament House there are three properties owned by the Parliament and another three that are leased. Holding six properties in the immediate area is hardly an efficient long-term use of accommodation. They are relatively expensive, and in many cases the buildings are inappropriate—for example, houses that have been converted. That has evolved over the years, and I make no comment on it, but these two factors come together. After discussions with the President and the Speaker, the government has asked the state architect, Mr Steve Woodland, to look at the parliamentary precinct as a whole and consider its future use. I expect that he will consult with not only the office bearers of the Parliament, but also the Leader of the Opposition and other interested members. Mr E.S. Ripper : You want it all fixed before you go back into opposition. Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
I thank the member for Nedlands for the question. I will answer the second part first. The lease on Governor Stirling Tower, which is the main accommodation for government and which covers the Department of the Premier and Cabinet, the Public Sector Commission, the Department of Treasury and Finance and the Department of Indigenous Affairs, expires in June 2012. Although the government would like to continue that lease, it is understood that the owner of the building is not prepared to do so. We will endeavour to gain some extension, but as it looks at the moment, Governor Stirling Tower will no longer be available after June 2012 as the principal accommodation for my office and the central agencies of the government. Somewhat coincidentally, I received a letter, dated 24 September, from the Speaker and the President raising issues about accommodation for the Parliament. As members are aware, this building, which is more than 100 years old, has its limitations, but it is the Parliament. The issue relates more to committee meeting rooms, areas where hearings are held, ancillary services and the like. Members are broadly aware that in the area of West Perth adjacent to Parliament House there are three properties owned by the Parliament and another three that are leased. Holding six properties in the immediate area is hardly an efficient long-term use of accommodation. They are relatively expensive, and in many cases the buildings are inappropriate—for example, houses that have been converted. That has evolved over the years, and I make no comment on it, but these two factors come together. After discussions with the President and the Speaker, the government has asked the state architect, Mr Steve Woodland, to look at the parliamentary precinct as a whole and consider its future use. I expect that he will consult with not only the office bearers of the Parliament, but also the Leader of the Opposition and other interested members. Mr E.S. Ripper : You want it all fixed before you go back into opposition. Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Somewhat coincidentally, I received a letter, dated 24 September, from the Speaker and the President raising issues about accommodation for the Parliament. As members are aware, this building, which is more than 100 years old, has its limitations, but it is the Parliament. The issue relates more to committee meeting rooms, areas where hearings are held, ancillary services and the like. Members are broadly aware that in the area of West Perth adjacent to Parliament House there are three properties owned by the Parliament and another three that are leased. Holding six properties in the immediate area is hardly an efficient long-term use of accommodation. They are relatively expensive, and in many cases the buildings are inappropriate—for example, houses that have been converted. That has evolved over the years, and I make no comment on it, but these two factors come together. After discussions with the President and the Speaker, the government has asked the state architect, Mr Steve Woodland, to look at the parliamentary precinct as a whole and consider its future use. I expect that he will consult with not only the office bearers of the Parliament, but also the Leader of the Opposition and other interested members. Mr E.S. Ripper : You want it all fixed before you go back into opposition. Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr E.S. Ripper : You want it all fixed before you go back into opposition. Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr C.J. BARNETT replied: I thank the member for Nedlands for the question. I will answer the second part first. The lease on Governor Stirling Tower, which is the main accommodation for government and which covers the Department of the Premier and Cabinet, the Public Sector Commission, the Department of Treasury and Finance and the Department of Indigenous Affairs, expires in June 2012. Although the government would like to continue that lease, it is understood that the owner of the building is not prepared to do so. We will endeavour to gain some extension, but as it looks at the moment, Governor Stirling Tower will no longer be available after June 2012 as the principal accommodation for my office and the central agencies of the government. Somewhat coincidentally, I received a letter, dated 24 September, from the Speaker and the President raising issues about accommodation for the Parliament. As members are aware, this building, which is more than 100 years old, has its limitations, but it is the Parliament. The issue relates more to committee meeting rooms, areas where hearings are held, ancillary services and the like. Members are broadly aware that in the area of West Perth adjacent to Parliament House there are three properties owned by the Parliament and another three that are leased. Holding six properties in the immediate area is hardly an efficient long-term use of accommodation. They are relatively expensive, and in many cases the buildings are inappropriate—for example, houses that have been converted. That has evolved over the years, and I make no comment on it, but these two factors come together. After discussions with the President and the Speaker, the government has asked the state architect, Mr Steve Woodland, to look at the parliamentary precinct as a whole and consider its future use. I expect that he will consult with not only the office bearers of the Parliament, but also the Leader of the Opposition and other interested members. Mr E.S. Ripper : You want it all fixed before you go back into opposition. Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
I thank the member for Nedlands for the question. I will answer the second part first. The lease on Governor Stirling Tower, which is the main accommodation for government and which covers the Department of the Premier and Cabinet, the Public Sector Commission, the Department of Treasury and Finance and the Department of Indigenous Affairs, expires in June 2012. Although the government would like to continue that lease, it is understood that the owner of the building is not prepared to do so. We will endeavour to gain some extension, but as it looks at the moment, Governor Stirling Tower will no longer be available after June 2012 as the principal accommodation for my office and the central agencies of the government. Somewhat coincidentally, I received a letter, dated 24 September, from the Speaker and the President raising issues about accommodation for the Parliament. As members are aware, this building, which is more than 100 years old, has its limitations, but it is the Parliament. The issue relates more to committee meeting rooms, areas where hearings are held, ancillary services and the like. Members are broadly aware that in the area of West Perth adjacent to Parliament House there are three properties owned by the Parliament and another three that are leased. Holding six properties in the immediate area is hardly an efficient long-term use of accommodation. They are relatively expensive, and in many cases the buildings are inappropriate—for example, houses that have been converted. That has evolved over the years, and I make no comment on it, but these two factors come together. After discussions with the President and the Speaker, the government has asked the state architect, Mr Steve Woodland, to look at the parliamentary precinct as a whole and consider its future use. I expect that he will consult with not only the office bearers of the Parliament, but also the Leader of the Opposition and other interested members. Mr E.S. Ripper : You want it all fixed before you go back into opposition. Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Somewhat coincidentally, I received a letter, dated 24 September, from the Speaker and the President raising issues about accommodation for the Parliament. As members are aware, this building, which is more than 100 years old, has its limitations, but it is the Parliament. The issue relates more to committee meeting rooms, areas where hearings are held, ancillary services and the like. Members are broadly aware that in the area of West Perth adjacent to Parliament House there are three properties owned by the Parliament and another three that are leased. Holding six properties in the immediate area is hardly an efficient long-term use of accommodation. They are relatively expensive, and in many cases the buildings are inappropriate—for example, houses that have been converted. That has evolved over the years, and I make no comment on it, but these two factors come together. After discussions with the President and the Speaker, the government has asked the state architect, Mr Steve Woodland, to look at the parliamentary precinct as a whole and consider its future use. I expect that he will consult with not only the office bearers of the Parliament, but also the Leader of the Opposition and other interested members. Mr E.S. Ripper : You want it all fixed before you go back into opposition. Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr E.S. Ripper : You want it all fixed before you go back into opposition. Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr C.J. BARNETT : It needs to be looked at. There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
There is no choice about the current government accommodation. The options obviously are to find other rental accommodation in the central business district, and there are some options in that area. The alternative is to construct a new government building within the parliamentary precinct. There will be views for and against that. I happen to think that it has a lot of merit. It might well be asked why the government would rent accommodation, and pay significantly for it, when the government does not pay taxes and owns unused land in this vicinity. At present, the rental and total expenses related to Governor Stirling Tower amount to around $14 million a year, so it is a substantial outlay for the government. That sort of outlay would probably go close to funding a purpose-built government office within this precinct. This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
This will obviously take several years, but related to that would be offices for the Premier and ministers. I have thought for a long time that the state should have a proper formal cabinet room. Members opposite have sat in the cabinet room. When this government returned to power, unsurprisingly, nothing had changed. It is the blandest meeting room in Western Australia. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Several members interjected. Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr C.J. BARNETT : This is the problem — Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr P.B. Watson : Sookie! Withdrawal of Remark The SPEAKER : Order! Member for Albany, I ask you to withdraw that comment. Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Mr P.B. WATSON : Sookie? I withdraw! Questions without Notice Resumed Mr C.J. BARNETT : One of the problems with Western Australia is that we often lack courage as a state to make the right sort of decisions. This decision should have the support of the Presiding Officers of the Parliament, and should have bipartisan political support. Maybe the time in history is here when we actually build an appropriate government office building, an appropriate Premier’s office and a cabinet room. That will be several years in the future. I know it is an easy thing to criticise and pull down; it is very easy to dumb down Western Australia. I hope that the Parliament and the public will realise that there is probably a far better way of operating the central agencies of government and the ancillary services of Parliament. I have made those points today to formally put the issue out there. Steve Woodland, the state architect, and others, including parliamentary representatives, will look at the precinct over coming months. I foreshadow that a decision would need to be taken within the next six months about the direction we go with the central accommodation of government, and whether an additional building is constructed to accommodate the ancillary services of Parliament.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.