Hon Nick Goiran asks the Attorney General about the Spent Convictions (Act Amendment) Regulations (No. 2) 2024, specifically the reasons for the amendments and the consultation process. The Attorney General states the amendment was consequential to the new Firearms Act 2024 and no consultation was necessary.

AnsweredQoN 49Legislative Council
Asked
9 April 2025
Portfolio
Attorney General

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the Spent Convictions (Act Amendment) Regulations (No. 2) 2024 , and I ask: (a) what was the catalyst for bringing about these amendments to the regulations; (b) who was consulted prior to these amendment regulations being finalised; (c) did any person consulted raise any concerns; (d) if yes to (c), what were these concerns; (e) in reference to (d), have the finalised amendment regulations addressed these concerns; and (f) if no to (e), why not?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
20 May 2025
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary to the Attorney General
Response time
5 days
(a)   The repeal of the Firearms Act 1973 and commencement of the Firearms Act 2024.
(b)   Consultation on the Amendment Regulations was not necessary as the amendment was purely consequential on the repeal of the 1973 Act by the commencement of the 2024 Act.
(c)   – (f) Not applicable.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more