❓ Hon Ben Dawkins questions the Minister for Planning regarding development conditions for the Binningup golf course, specifically referencing historical correspondence and statutory requirements under town planning scheme 12. The Minister deflects, referring to previous answers.
AnsweredQoN 971Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
PLANNING —
DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
971. Hon BEN DAWKINS to the minister representing the
Minister for Planning:
I refer to the answer provided to
question without notice 901 and note that contrary to the answer provided,
there are in fact statutory requirements for the Binningup golf course to be
constructed by a certain date and provided permanently for the benefit of the
community under town planning scheme 12.
(1) Can the
minister confirm that the letter from the developer dated 11 September 1995—I
have emailed it to him; I am not tabling it—contained the words ''the
development proposals � are based on a golf course development and the first 9
holes have been developed and are in use on a regular basis'' in
relation to stage 1 of the development?
(2) Can the minister confirm that approval for stage
2, Lakewood Shores, was granted in the letter to the developer from the
shire dated 26 October 1995, and that the Planning Commission letter of 12 December
1995—both of which I have emailed to him—stated approval was
contingent on the milestones outlined in the 11 September 1995 letter,
including future compliance with TPS 12, which specifies that the golf course
must not be modified in any way that causes it not to function?
DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
971. Hon BEN DAWKINS to the minister representing the
Minister for Planning:
I refer to the answer provided to
question without notice 901 and note that contrary to the answer provided,
there are in fact statutory requirements for the Binningup golf course to be
constructed by a certain date and provided permanently for the benefit of the
community under town planning scheme 12.
(1) Can the
minister confirm that the letter from the developer dated 11 September 1995—I
have emailed it to him; I am not tabling it—contained the words ''the
development proposals � are based on a golf course development and the first 9
holes have been developed and are in use on a regular basis'' in
relation to stage 1 of the development?
(2) Can the minister confirm that approval for stage
2, Lakewood Shores, was granted in the letter to the developer from the
shire dated 26 October 1995, and that the Planning Commission letter of 12 December
1995—both of which I have emailed to him—stated approval was
contingent on the milestones outlined in the 11 September 1995 letter,
including future compliance with TPS 12, which specifies that the golf course
must not be modified in any way that causes it not to function?
AnswerView source ↗
The following response has been
provided by the Minister for Planning.
(1)–(2) The minister refers
the member to responses provided to these questions over the last two years.
provided by the Minister for Planning.
(1)–(2) The minister refers
the member to responses provided to these questions over the last two years.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.