❓ This WA parliamentary question concerns the implementation of recommendations from a review of the Western Australian Technology & Industry Advisory Council (TIAC), covering its independence, appointments, remuneration, and the ITD Act amendment.
AnsweredQoN 1833Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
The recommendations of the Review were as follows: (1) The Western Australian Technology & Industry Advisory Council (TIAC) remain as an independent specialist policy board affiliated with the Department as defined under the ITD Act. (2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006. (3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(1) The Western Australian Technology & Industry Advisory Council (TIAC) remain as an independent specialist policy board affiliated with the Department as defined under the ITD Act. (2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006. (3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(1) The Western Australian Technology & Industry Advisory Council (TIAC) remain as an independent specialist policy board affiliated with the Department as defined under the ITD Act. (2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006. (3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006. (3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006. (3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(1) The Western Australian Technology & Industry Advisory Council (TIAC) remain as an independent specialist policy board affiliated with the Department as defined under the ITD Act. (2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006. (3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(1) The Western Australian Technology & Industry Advisory Council (TIAC) remain as an independent specialist policy board affiliated with the Department as defined under the ITD Act. (2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006. (3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006. (3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006. (3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees. (4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council. (5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
(5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review. Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Actions: Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 1 The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government. Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 2 No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise. Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 3 TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations. Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 4 Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy. Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Recommendation 5 The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
27 March 2007
Responded by
Minister for Industry and Enterprise
Response time
26 days
Answer
The Minister for Industry and Enterprise has provided the following response:
The recommendations of the Review were as follows:
(1) The Western Australian Technology & Industry Advisory Council (TIAC) remain as an independent specialist policy board affiliated with the Department as defined under the ITD Act.
(2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006.
(3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees.
(4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council.
(5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review.
Actions:
Recommendation 1
The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government.
Recommendation 2
No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise.
Recommendation 3
TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations.
Recommendation 4
Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy.
Recommendation 5
The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
The Minister for Industry and Enterprise has provided the following response:
The recommendations of the Review were as follows:
(1) The Western Australian Technology & Industry Advisory Council (TIAC) remain as an independent specialist policy board affiliated with the Department as defined under the ITD Act.
(2) The Minister considers, after taking advice from TIAC, making a common appointment between the Premier's Science Council and TIAC when TIAC appointments are due in 2005 and 2006.
(3) TIAC remuneration should be reviewed in June 2006 and the 2005/06 budget should contain provision for an increase in TIAC member fees.
(4) Terms of appointment for TIAC members should be such that they provide for a balance of experience and renewal in the total membership of TIAC so as to provide for continuing stability in the Council.
(5) The ITD Act be amended to include environmental impact in section 21 and increasing the penalty under Schedule 1 Division 1 section 16 to $10,000. These amendments should be considered along with any amendments that arise from the second stage of the ITD Act review.
Actions:
Recommendation 1
The Review concluded that TIAC performs an essential role in providing independent balanced, strategic advice to the Government. Since the Review TIAC has continued to operate as an independent advisory body providing advice to Government.
Recommendation 2
No common appointments between TIAC and the Science Council have been made. Since the Review was tabled in September 2004 only two new appointments have been made to TIAC. In January 2005, Cabinet endorsed two appointments for a three-year term expiring on 31 January 2008. These appointments were made following the resignations of two TIAC members with similar skills and specialist expertise.
Recommendation 3
TIAC's operating budget in 2005/06 and 2006/07 contained provisions for an increase in members' meeting fees as per the Review recommendations.
Recommendation 4
Appointments to TIAC are for a 3-year period, are based on the skills and experience of individuals and to ensure membership reflects the diversity of the WA economy.
Recommendation 5
The second stage review of the ITD Act is currently being progressed.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.