Hon Robin Chapple asks about the current rateable value of sites A and B of the Pluto LNG project, given improvements made. The Minister provides the unimproved value (UV) and rates payable for sites A and B, noting site E is vacant.

AnsweredQoN 818Legislative Council
Asked
20 November 2013
Portfolio
Lands

QuestionView source ↗

PLUTO LNG
PROJECT — BURRUP PENINSULA
818. Hon ROBIN CHAPPLE to the
minister representing the Minister for Lands:
I refer to the document ''Rental Values Sites A, B and
E Pluto LNG Project — Burrup Peninsula'', which can be found on
my website and which calculates rental values based on unencumbered leasehold
tenure of the three undeveloped sites. Given that site B and part of site A
were used for the Pluto LNG facility and have now been improved, what is the
current rateable value of the area of each site?
The PRESIDENT : We are like the ABC here; we do not allow
any commercial advertising!

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the honourable member for some notice of this
question.
The Shire of Roebourne invoices Woodside directly for the
Pluto site rates. Site A, lots 384 and 574, and site B, lot 572, are invoiced
separately, assessed on the basis of unimproved value. Site E is vacant and not
currently leased. The 2013 rate notice for site A notes the UV as $1 150 000,
resulting in a rates payable amount of $182 225.50 for the period 1 July 2013
to 30 June 2014. The 2013 rate notice for site B notes the UV as $3 million,
resulting in a rates payable amount of $475 371 for the period 1 July 2013 to
30 June 2014.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more