❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding the cost, creation, and accuracy of an animation depicting the southern railway project. The questions focus on technical details and the animation's intended purpose in public consultation.
AnsweredQoN 672Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the animation released by the minister showing various aspects of the southern railway. (1) How much did the animation cost? (2) Was it done by the Public Service or on contract? (3) In view of the qualification by the minister about the non-specific nature of the animation - (a) what use can be made of the animation; (b) what purpose is it intended to serve; and (c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge? Hon KIM CHANCE
AnswerView source ↗
(1) $32 000. (2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(1) How much did the animation cost? (2) Was it done by the Public Service or on contract? (3) In view of the qualification by the minister about the non-specific nature of the animation - (a) what use can be made of the animation; (b) what purpose is it intended to serve; and (c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1) $32 000. (2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(2) Was it done by the Public Service or on contract? (3) In view of the qualification by the minister about the non-specific nature of the animation - (a) what use can be made of the animation; (b) what purpose is it intended to serve; and (c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1) $32 000. (2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(3) In view of the qualification by the minister about the non-specific nature of the animation - (a) what use can be made of the animation; (b) what purpose is it intended to serve; and (c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1) $32 000. (2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(b) what purpose is it intended to serve; and (c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge?
(c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge?
(ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(1) $32 000. (2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(1) How much did the animation cost? (2) Was it done by the Public Service or on contract? (3) In view of the qualification by the minister about the non-specific nature of the animation - (a) what use can be made of the animation; (b) what purpose is it intended to serve; and (c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1) $32 000. (2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(2) Was it done by the Public Service or on contract? (3) In view of the qualification by the minister about the non-specific nature of the animation - (a) what use can be made of the animation; (b) what purpose is it intended to serve; and (c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1) $32 000. (2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(3) In view of the qualification by the minister about the non-specific nature of the animation - (a) what use can be made of the animation; (b) what purpose is it intended to serve; and (c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: (1) $32 000. (2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(b) what purpose is it intended to serve; and (c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge?
(c) can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that it shows - (i) two railway lines crossing Mt Henry Bridge; (ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers? (d) Can any conclusion be drawn from the fact that there is no mention on the web site or in the animations of any stations between Canning Bridge and the Narrows Bridge?
(ii) two railway lines crossing the Narrows Bridge; (iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(iii) no visible extra means of support to either bridge; (iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(iv) the top of a train crossing the Narrows Bridge as being below the waist height of a person behind the train; (v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(v) elsewhere the top of the train appears to suggest that the track must have been sunk into the ground; (vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(vi) the train as a heavy standard gauge rather than narrow light rail; (vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(vii) no overhead power supply cables; and (viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(viii) the space outside the rails and between the rails as wide as the space occupied by the rails themselves while still contained within the existing concrete barriers?
(1) $32 000. (2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(2) Contract. (3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(3) (a) For education and to stimulate discussions with stakeholders. Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
Hon N.F. Moore: Has it been successful in that regard? Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
Hon KIM CHANCE: Indeed it has. The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
The answer continues - It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
It is intended to give people a clear understanding of the scale and visual aspects of a railway in the freeway and into the city. This is an important part of the public consultation process. (b) The animation will be used in the consultation process, shown at public meetings and at stakeholder meetings. It is also available on the web. (c) The purpose was to illustrate the essential nature of the service. The technical aspects were sufficiently developed to give the correct sense of the railway. The overhead power system was in fact accentuated in some shots. (d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
(d) The video is necessarily general at this time.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.