❓ Hon Robin Chapple questions the consistency and modifications of the Lake Monger Aboriginal site (DIA 3788) with the Preliminary Report on the Survey of Aboriginal areas, revealing boundary adjustments due to infrastructure and alignment with the original PRSAS description. The Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee was not consulted for these amendments.
AnsweredQoN 5486Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
With reference to the
Preliminary report on the Survey of Aboriginal areas of significance in the Perth Metropolitan and Murray River Regions
(PRSAS) of which part is listed at
http://robinchapple.com/sites/default/files/Aboriginal%20areas%20of%20significance%20in%20Perth.pdf
and the Site 3788 on the register of Aboriginal sites, I ask -
(1) In respect of site 3788, is this currently consistent with the site definition described within the PRSAS?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) If yes to (1), how is it consistent?
(4) Has the area of the Lake Monger aboriginal site or site 3788 been altered in any why since the PRSAS set out the area?
(5) If yes to (4), when and why?
(6) Has the lake Monger site been modified at any time since its establishment?
(7) If yes to (6), when?
(8) If yes to (6), how?
(9) If yes to (6), for what purpose was it modified?
(10) Did any of the above amendments go before the Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee?
(11) If yes to (10), when did that occur and what was the decision?
Preliminary report on the Survey of Aboriginal areas of significance in the Perth Metropolitan and Murray River Regions
(PRSAS) of which part is listed at
http://robinchapple.com/sites/default/files/Aboriginal%20areas%20of%20significance%20in%20Perth.pdf
and the Site 3788 on the register of Aboriginal sites, I ask -
(1) In respect of site 3788, is this currently consistent with the site definition described within the PRSAS?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) If yes to (1), how is it consistent?
(4) Has the area of the Lake Monger aboriginal site or site 3788 been altered in any why since the PRSAS set out the area?
(5) If yes to (4), when and why?
(6) Has the lake Monger site been modified at any time since its establishment?
(7) If yes to (6), when?
(8) If yes to (6), how?
(9) If yes to (6), for what purpose was it modified?
(10) Did any of the above amendments go before the Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee?
(11) If yes to (10), when did that occur and what was the decision?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
12 June 2012
Responded by
Minister for Indigenous Affairs
Response time
42 days
(1) Yes
(2) Not applicable.
(3) The boundary captures the lake itself and the open space surrounding it between Gregory Street to the West, Powis Street to the North, Mitchell Freeway to the East and Lake Monger Drive to the South. This is how the area of significance is described in the Preliminary Report on the Survey of Aboriginal areas in the Perth Metropolitan and Murray River Regions (PRSAS).
(4) Yes
(5) The boundary for DIA 3788 (Lake Monger) was amended on 22 September 2005 to exclude the South-East corner of the previously recorded site boundary where the Mitchell Freeway onramp existed at the time of the PRSAS recording.
(6) Yes
(7) September 2009
(8 - 9) The boundary of the Lake Monger site was modified to be more consistent with the PRSAS description of the area of significance as it existed at the time the PRSAS survey was conducted.
(10) No
(11) Not applicable.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(2) Not applicable.
(3) The boundary captures the lake itself and the open space surrounding it between Gregory Street to the West, Powis Street to the North, Mitchell Freeway to the East and Lake Monger Drive to the South. This is how the area of significance is described in the Preliminary Report on the Survey of Aboriginal areas in the Perth Metropolitan and Murray River Regions (PRSAS).
(4) Yes
(5) The boundary for DIA 3788 (Lake Monger) was amended on 22 September 2005 to exclude the South-East corner of the previously recorded site boundary where the Mitchell Freeway onramp existed at the time of the PRSAS recording.
(6) Yes
(7) September 2009
(8 - 9) The boundary of the Lake Monger site was modified to be more consistent with the PRSAS description of the area of significance as it existed at the time the PRSAS survey was conducted.
(10) No
(11) Not applicable.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.