The Leader of the Opposition questions the Premier's confidence in the Minister for Emergency Services following the Keelty report on the Roleystone-Kelmscott bushfires, while the Premier defends the Minister and outlines organizational changes within FESA.

AnsweredQoN 474Legislative Assembly
Asked
17 August 2011
Portfolio
Premier

QuestionView source ↗

Roleystone–Kelmscott Bushfires — Keelty Report — minister for emergency services
Mr Speaker, my question without notice — The SPEAKER : I have given the Leader of the Opposition the call; I have not given anybody else the call. I notice that the person the Leader of the Opposition wishes to ask a question of is in this place. Mr E.S. RIPPER : My question without notice is to the Premier. (1) In the wake of the Keelty report, how can the Premier possibly have confidence in his Minister for Emergency Services? (2) What is the meaning of ministerial responsibility in the Premier’s government if this minister retains the emergency services portfolio? (3) Why precisely has Jo Harrison-Ward been punished while the Premier’s dozy minister escapes unscathed? Mr C.J. BARNETT

AnswerView source ↗

(1)–(3) Let me make it clear that I do have confidence in the Minister for Emergency Services. Again, this report by Mick Keelty is in the first instance about the fire and the operations that took place on the day. As members in this house understand and as the public understands, that is operational; it is not something in which a minister should play any role. I know that is an obvious thing to state, but the report is about what happened on the day, and some operational failings that clearly happened. Behind that—Mr Keelty talks about this—are some of the cultural changes that are needed within the Fire and Emergency Services Authority. Mr E.S. Ripper interjected. The SPEAKER : Leader of the Opposition! Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
The SPEAKER : I have given the Leader of the Opposition the call; I have not given anybody else the call. I notice that the person the Leader of the Opposition wishes to ask a question of is in this place. Mr E.S. RIPPER : My question without notice is to the Premier. (1) In the wake of the Keelty report, how can the Premier possibly have confidence in his Minister for Emergency Services? (2) What is the meaning of ministerial responsibility in the Premier’s government if this minister retains the emergency services portfolio? (3) Why precisely has Jo Harrison-Ward been punished while the Premier’s dozy minister escapes unscathed? Mr C.J. BARNETT replied: (1)–(3) Let me make it clear that I do have confidence in the Minister for Emergency Services. Again, this report by Mick Keelty is in the first instance about the fire and the operations that took place on the day. As members in this house understand and as the public understands, that is operational; it is not something in which a minister should play any role. I know that is an obvious thing to state, but the report is about what happened on the day, and some operational failings that clearly happened. Behind that—Mr Keelty talks about this—are some of the cultural changes that are needed within the Fire and Emergency Services Authority. Mr E.S. Ripper interjected. The SPEAKER : Leader of the Opposition! Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
Mr E.S. RIPPER : My question without notice is to the Premier. (1) In the wake of the Keelty report, how can the Premier possibly have confidence in his Minister for Emergency Services? (2) What is the meaning of ministerial responsibility in the Premier’s government if this minister retains the emergency services portfolio? (3) Why precisely has Jo Harrison-Ward been punished while the Premier’s dozy minister escapes unscathed? Mr C.J. BARNETT replied: (1)–(3) Let me make it clear that I do have confidence in the Minister for Emergency Services. Again, this report by Mick Keelty is in the first instance about the fire and the operations that took place on the day. As members in this house understand and as the public understands, that is operational; it is not something in which a minister should play any role. I know that is an obvious thing to state, but the report is about what happened on the day, and some operational failings that clearly happened. Behind that—Mr Keelty talks about this—are some of the cultural changes that are needed within the Fire and Emergency Services Authority. Mr E.S. Ripper interjected. The SPEAKER : Leader of the Opposition! Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
(1) In the wake of the Keelty report, how can the Premier possibly have confidence in his Minister for Emergency Services? (2) What is the meaning of ministerial responsibility in the Premier’s government if this minister retains the emergency services portfolio? (3) Why precisely has Jo Harrison-Ward been punished while the Premier’s dozy minister escapes unscathed? Mr C.J. BARNETT replied: (1)–(3) Let me make it clear that I do have confidence in the Minister for Emergency Services. Again, this report by Mick Keelty is in the first instance about the fire and the operations that took place on the day. As members in this house understand and as the public understands, that is operational; it is not something in which a minister should play any role. I know that is an obvious thing to state, but the report is about what happened on the day, and some operational failings that clearly happened. Behind that—Mr Keelty talks about this—are some of the cultural changes that are needed within the Fire and Emergency Services Authority. Mr E.S. Ripper interjected. The SPEAKER : Leader of the Opposition! Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
(2) What is the meaning of ministerial responsibility in the Premier’s government if this minister retains the emergency services portfolio? (3) Why precisely has Jo Harrison-Ward been punished while the Premier’s dozy minister escapes unscathed? Mr C.J. BARNETT replied: (1)–(3) Let me make it clear that I do have confidence in the Minister for Emergency Services. Again, this report by Mick Keelty is in the first instance about the fire and the operations that took place on the day. As members in this house understand and as the public understands, that is operational; it is not something in which a minister should play any role. I know that is an obvious thing to state, but the report is about what happened on the day, and some operational failings that clearly happened. Behind that—Mr Keelty talks about this—are some of the cultural changes that are needed within the Fire and Emergency Services Authority. Mr E.S. Ripper interjected. The SPEAKER : Leader of the Opposition! Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
(3) Why precisely has Jo Harrison-Ward been punished while the Premier’s dozy minister escapes unscathed? Mr C.J. BARNETT replied: (1)–(3) Let me make it clear that I do have confidence in the Minister for Emergency Services. Again, this report by Mick Keelty is in the first instance about the fire and the operations that took place on the day. As members in this house understand and as the public understands, that is operational; it is not something in which a minister should play any role. I know that is an obvious thing to state, but the report is about what happened on the day, and some operational failings that clearly happened. Behind that—Mr Keelty talks about this—are some of the cultural changes that are needed within the Fire and Emergency Services Authority. Mr E.S. Ripper interjected. The SPEAKER : Leader of the Opposition! Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
Mr C.J. BARNETT replied: (1)–(3) Let me make it clear that I do have confidence in the Minister for Emergency Services. Again, this report by Mick Keelty is in the first instance about the fire and the operations that took place on the day. As members in this house understand and as the public understands, that is operational; it is not something in which a minister should play any role. I know that is an obvious thing to state, but the report is about what happened on the day, and some operational failings that clearly happened. Behind that—Mr Keelty talks about this—are some of the cultural changes that are needed within the Fire and Emergency Services Authority. Mr E.S. Ripper interjected. The SPEAKER : Leader of the Opposition! Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
(1)–(3) Let me make it clear that I do have confidence in the Minister for Emergency Services. Again, this report by Mick Keelty is in the first instance about the fire and the operations that took place on the day. As members in this house understand and as the public understands, that is operational; it is not something in which a minister should play any role. I know that is an obvious thing to state, but the report is about what happened on the day, and some operational failings that clearly happened. Behind that—Mr Keelty talks about this—are some of the cultural changes that are needed within the Fire and Emergency Services Authority. Mr E.S. Ripper interjected. The SPEAKER : Leader of the Opposition! Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
Mr E.S. Ripper interjected. The SPEAKER : Leader of the Opposition! Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
The SPEAKER : Leader of the Opposition! Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
Mr C.J. BARNETT : I am trying to answer the question. It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
It is clear from this report that there needs to be major organisational and cultural change within FESA. To do that, we must start at the top of the organisation. That is why I discussed that issue yesterday with the Public Sector Commissioner. He met with Jo Harrison-Ward this morning, they discussed the issue and she agreed that she would step aside. It was instigated by government, but she agreed. In the light of this report and in the light of the need to make these changes, she stood aside. And I want to publicly thank Jo for doing that—for stepping aside to clear the way for these changes to be made within the organisation. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
The SPEAKER : Thank you, members! Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
Mr C.J. BARNETT : That is what has happened. That is correct. We are now in the process of finding someone to take overall responsibility for FESA in the short term, and then there will be interim arrangements. As I also said this morning, this report is reflecting on longer-term organisational and cultural issues that go back over many, many years, and everyone in Western Australia knows that. This government commissioned the report. It is a warts-and-all report. We have taken it on board; we have endorsed the recommendations. We have acted immediately today on the start of implementing this report. One of the major features that comes through from this report is that we need a clear line of command, responsibility and reporting in the cases of fire and major emergencies. Although no formal decision has yet been made, that is why this government is favouring the appointment of a fire chief or a fire commissioner to head the organisation. Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.
Can I say with respect to other organisations such as the Department of Environment and Conservation, local government, even planning agencies and volunteer firefighters that there is a shared responsibility here, and it would be wrong to simply focus entirely on FESA, even though the report gives great attention to that, because there are recommendations relating to clearing, planning requirements, responsibilities of local government and the like. It is a very comprehensive and very far-reaching report.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more