Hon Ken Travers, on behalf of Hon Darren West, asks about the government's options for reclaiming or maintaining Tier 3 rail lines after variations to the original agreement with Brookfield Rail. The response indicates significant costs associated with both options.

AnsweredQoN 1316Legislative Council
Asked
25 November 2014
Portfolio
Transport

QuestionView source ↗

RAIL
FREIGHT CORRIDOR LAND USE AGREEMENT
1316. Hon KEN TRAVERS to the
parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Transport:
I ask this question on behalf of Hon Darren West, who is unfortunately away from the chamber on urgent
parliamentary business. I refer to question without notice 1250.
As a result of the
variations made to the original agreement, what mechanisms or options are now
available to the government to —
(a) take back the tier 3 lines; or
(b) keep these lines open?

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of this question. On
behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Transport,
I provide the following response —
(a) The Public
Transport Authority has no legal mechanism to take back the tier 3 lines but
could potentially negotiate with Brookfield Rail for it to hand back the lines
to the PTA, but it is expected that it would be at a substantial cost to the
government.
(b) The PTA
would estimate this cost to be at least $100 million to upgrade tier 3 lines to
an appropriate performance standard.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more