❓ A parliamentary question asks if a public disagreement by Mr. Riebeling with the Government was sanctioned by higher authorities. The Premier's representative dismisses the assertion as 'far-fetched'.
AnsweredQoN 1093Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
It is asserted in today’s The West Australian by Mr Robert Taylor - It wouldn’t be too far fetched to suggest that Mr Riebeling’s uncharacteristic public break with his Government was sanctioned from on high. Is this correct; if it is not, what is correct? Hon KIM CHANCE
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the Leader of the Opposition for maintaining his sense of humour. The answer is that the assertion is far-fetched.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the Leader of the Opposition for maintaining his sense of humour. The answer is that the assertion is far-fetched.
I thank the Leader of the Opposition for maintaining his sense of humour. The answer is that the assertion is far-fetched.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the Leader of the Opposition for maintaining his sense of humour. The answer is that the assertion is far-fetched.
I thank the Leader of the Opposition for maintaining his sense of humour. The answer is that the assertion is far-fetched.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.