Mr Ripper asks why the Premier didn't answer the second part of a question. The Premier claims his initial answer covered both parts, leading to interjections and the Speaker calling for order.

AnsweredQoN 235Legislative Assembly
Asked
11 October 2000
Member
Portfolio
Premier

QuestionView source ↗

As a supplementary question, why has the Premier not answered the second part of the question? Mr COURT

AnswerView source ↗

I should have said (1) and (2) at the beginning of my answer because it covered both parts of the question. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order!
Mr COURT replied: I should have said (1) and (2) at the beginning of my answer because it covered both parts of the question. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order!
I should have said (1) and (2) at the beginning of my answer because it covered both parts of the question. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order!
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order!
The SPEAKER: Order!

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more