A parliamentary question regarding juveniles involved in a high-speed chase, specifically their prior offences, supervision orders, and potential breaches. The response details the offenders' prior offences and breach status.

AnsweredQoN 482Legislative Council
Asked
24 June 2004
Portfolio
Justice

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the juveniles captured after a high-speed chase early on Sunday morning, 13 June 2004. (1) Were any of the offenders involved subject to any form of detention or supervision orders or bail limitations? If so - (a) what type of detention, supervision orders or limitations; and (b) for what type of offences were these in place? (2) When the offenders were apprehended, did the police locate within the vehicle or on their persons, any evidence of a further offence of the type for which they had been made subject to the order or limitation; for example, drugs or home burglary? (3) Had the juveniles, prior to being apprehended on Sunday and after they were made subject to such order or limitation - (a) been breached with respect to those orders or limitations; or (b) done any acts or made any omissions to the knowledge of Department of Justice officers for which they could have been breached? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Justice provides the following response - (1) The Department of Justice advises that offender 1 was on supervised bail and offender 2 was on a supervised release order. Offences included attempted stealing, burglary, stealing a motor vehicle, aggravated indecent assault, indecent dealings with a child under 13 years, breach of bail, receiving, carrying a controlled weapon, reckless driving and escaping legal custody. Hon Simon O’Brien: Was there any jaywalking as well? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS: This is in answer to the question of Hon Peter Foss, not the interjection of Hon Simon O’Brien. (2) Yes. (3) (a) Offender 1, no; offender 2, breach action initiated but not completed; (b) offender 1, no; offender 2, yes.
(1) Were any of the offenders involved subject to any form of detention or supervision orders or bail limitations? If so - (a) what type of detention, supervision orders or limitations; and (b) for what type of offences were these in place? (2) When the offenders were apprehended, did the police locate within the vehicle or on their persons, any evidence of a further offence of the type for which they had been made subject to the order or limitation; for example, drugs or home burglary? (3) Had the juveniles, prior to being apprehended on Sunday and after they were made subject to such order or limitation - (a) been breached with respect to those orders or limitations; or (b) done any acts or made any omissions to the knowledge of Department of Justice officers for which they could have been breached? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Justice provides the following response - (1) The Department of Justice advises that offender 1 was on supervised bail and offender 2 was on a supervised release order. Offences included attempted stealing, burglary, stealing a motor vehicle, aggravated indecent assault, indecent dealings with a child under 13 years, breach of bail, receiving, carrying a controlled weapon, reckless driving and escaping legal custody. Hon Simon O’Brien: Was there any jaywalking as well? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS: This is in answer to the question of Hon Peter Foss, not the interjection of Hon Simon O’Brien. (2) Yes. (3) (a) Offender 1, no; offender 2, breach action initiated but not completed; (b) offender 1, no; offender 2, yes.
(b) for what type of offences were these in place?
(3) Had the juveniles, prior to being apprehended on Sunday and after they were made subject to such order or limitation - (a) been breached with respect to those orders or limitations; or (b) done any acts or made any omissions to the knowledge of Department of Justice officers for which they could have been breached? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Justice provides the following response - (1) The Department of Justice advises that offender 1 was on supervised bail and offender 2 was on a supervised release order. Offences included attempted stealing, burglary, stealing a motor vehicle, aggravated indecent assault, indecent dealings with a child under 13 years, breach of bail, receiving, carrying a controlled weapon, reckless driving and escaping legal custody. Hon Simon O’Brien: Was there any jaywalking as well? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS: This is in answer to the question of Hon Peter Foss, not the interjection of Hon Simon O’Brien. (2) Yes. (3) (a) Offender 1, no; offender 2, breach action initiated but not completed; (b) offender 1, no; offender 2, yes.
(b) done any acts or made any omissions to the knowledge of Department of Justice officers for which they could have been breached?
I thank the member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Justice provides the following response - (1) The Department of Justice advises that offender 1 was on supervised bail and offender 2 was on a supervised release order. Offences included attempted stealing, burglary, stealing a motor vehicle, aggravated indecent assault, indecent dealings with a child under 13 years, breach of bail, receiving, carrying a controlled weapon, reckless driving and escaping legal custody. Hon Simon O’Brien: Was there any jaywalking as well? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS: This is in answer to the question of Hon Peter Foss, not the interjection of Hon Simon O’Brien. (2) Yes. (3) (a) Offender 1, no; offender 2, breach action initiated but not completed; (b) offender 1, no; offender 2, yes.
(1) The Department of Justice advises that offender 1 was on supervised bail and offender 2 was on a supervised release order. Offences included attempted stealing, burglary, stealing a motor vehicle, aggravated indecent assault, indecent dealings with a child under 13 years, breach of bail, receiving, carrying a controlled weapon, reckless driving and escaping legal custody. Hon Simon O’Brien: Was there any jaywalking as well? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS: This is in answer to the question of Hon Peter Foss, not the interjection of Hon Simon O’Brien. (2) Yes. (3) (a) Offender 1, no; offender 2, breach action initiated but not completed; (b) offender 1, no; offender 2, yes.
Hon Simon O’Brien: Was there any jaywalking as well? Hon NICK GRIFFITHS: This is in answer to the question of Hon Peter Foss, not the interjection of Hon Simon O’Brien. (2) Yes. (3) (a) Offender 1, no; offender 2, breach action initiated but not completed; (b) offender 1, no; offender 2, yes.
Hon NICK GRIFFITHS: This is in answer to the question of Hon Peter Foss, not the interjection of Hon Simon O’Brien. (2) Yes. (3) (a) Offender 1, no; offender 2, breach action initiated but not completed; (b) offender 1, no; offender 2, yes.
(2) Yes. (3) (a) Offender 1, no; offender 2, breach action initiated but not completed; (b) offender 1, no; offender 2, yes.
(3) (a) Offender 1, no; offender 2, breach action initiated but not completed; (b) offender 1, no; offender 2, yes.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more