A WA parliamentary question regarding single-occupancy vehicles at train station car parks and the feasibility of prioritising parking for carpoolers. The government cites administrative difficulties and costs as reasons for not implementing a priority system.

AnsweredQoN 784Legislative Assembly
Asked
5 May 2009
Portfolio
Transport

QuestionView source ↗

(1) What percentage of vehicles parked at Gosnells, Seaforth and Thornlie Station car parks arrive with only one passenger?
(2) Why has the Government not instigated a system that gives priority parking at Perth metropolitan train stations to cars that have more than two passengers?
(3) By requiring cars parked at train stations to have more than two passengers, will the capacity of train station car parks be at least doubled?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
9 June 2009
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Transport
Response time
35 days
(1)The percentage of vehicles parked at Gosnells, Seaforth and Thornlie stations that arrive with only one passenger is unknown.
(2) The Public Transport Authority has not implemented a system to give priority to multiple occupancy vehicles because of the difficulty with administration and the extra costs that would be associated with policing such a system.
(3) No, the capacity of train station car parks will not be doubled by car pooling. Not all passengers will want to or be able to arrange to share their journey to the station.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more