Opposition asks the Minister for Transport about legal advice regarding the withholding of the Main Roads strategic asset plan. The Minister deflects, questioning the opposition's record and stating the plan's confidentiality due to future cabinet decisions.

AnsweredQoN 895Legislative Assembly
Asked
10 November 2016
Portfolio
Transport

QuestionView source ↗

MAIN ROADS
— STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN
895. Ms R. SAFFIOTI to the
Minister for Transport:
I refer to the
minister's comments yesterday that he had received legal advice
regarding withholding the release of the Main Roads strategic asset plan and
classifying the plan as cabinet-in-confidence.
(1) What was the advice
provided and who provided that legal advice?
(2) Why did the government table a 2015–16
strategic asset plan and why has that advice changed so dramatically under the
minister's stewardship?

AnswerView source ↗

(1)–(2) I thank the member for the question.
I am unaware of how many asset management plans the member tabled when she was
in government, but I would suggest it was none.
Several members
interjected.
The SPEAKER : That is enough.
Several members
interjected.
The SPEAKER : Member for Girrawheen, I call you to order for the first time.
Mr W.R. MARMION : Before I came into Parliament, I did a number
of those plans for government departments and they were confidential, because
they provide a framework for cabinet to make decisions on in the future in
terms of future expenditure. That is the advice I have and that is why I am not
going to release them. If I get advice to the contrary that I can release them,
I will consider it.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more