❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice from 2005 inquires about the number of public servants in the Department of Housing and Works who received specific salary increases and contract rollovers, and whether they had performance reviews.
AnsweredQoN 2860Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
15 March 2006
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Housing and Works
Response time
127 days
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(a) 2001 Six (Note: As at 30 June 2001 the Department of Housing and Works did not exist. The figure reportedis only for the former Ministry of Housing officers classified Class 1 and above). 2005Thirteen (Note: This figure includes all Department of Housing and Works officers classified Level 9 2 nd year and above). (b) 2001 One 2005 Nil (c) 2001 Nil 2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
2005Thirteen (Note: This figure includes all Department of Housing and Works officers classified Level 9 2 nd year and above). (b) 2001 One 2005 Nil (c) 2001 Nil 2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
(b) 2001 One 2005 Nil (c) 2001 Nil 2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
2005 Nil (c) 2001 Nil 2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
(c) 2001 Nil 2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(a) 2001 Six (Note: As at 30 June 2001 the Department of Housing and Works did not exist. The figure reportedis only for the former Ministry of Housing officers classified Class 1 and above). 2005Thirteen (Note: This figure includes all Department of Housing and Works officers classified Level 9 2 nd year and above). (b) 2001 One 2005 Nil (c) 2001 Nil 2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
2005Thirteen (Note: This figure includes all Department of Housing and Works officers classified Level 9 2 nd year and above). (b) 2001 One 2005 Nil (c) 2001 Nil 2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
(b) 2001 One 2005 Nil (c) 2001 Nil 2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
2005 Nil (c) 2001 Nil 2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
(c) 2001 Nil 2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
2005 Nil (Note: As at 30 June 2005, the Director General's position was substantively vacant. The position has a tenured annual salary of less than $200,000 and a non-tenured annual salary over $200,000. The total annual salary paid to officer acting in the position as at 30 June 2005 was less than $150,000) (2) (a)Eight; (b) Nil; and (c) Nil. (3) N/A(Note: The eight public servants in question (2) all had their contracts rolled over and therefore did not have to apply for their positions). (4) Nine
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.