❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks details on Commonwealth funding for disability services in WA from 1997-98 to 2001-02, including pledged amounts, actual payments, and any discrepancies. The response indicates no late or under payments.
AnsweredQoN 1091Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
For each of the financial years 1997-98 to 2001-02 - (1) What amount of funding was pledged to Western Australia by the Commonwealth under the Commonwealth-State Disability Agreement? (2) What amount of funding did the Commonwealth provide, or, in the case of the current year, will it provide? (3) In dollar amounts, what portion was provided in each year as part of the defined CSDA and the defined bilateral agreement? (4) Have the payments in any year exceeded the agreed amount beyond the indexation provisions; and, if so, by how much, for what purposes, and at the initiative of which parties? (5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(1) What amount of funding was pledged to Western Australia by the Commonwealth under the Commonwealth-State Disability Agreement? (2) What amount of funding did the Commonwealth provide, or, in the case of the current year, will it provide? (3) In dollar amounts, what portion was provided in each year as part of the defined CSDA and the defined bilateral agreement? (4) Have the payments in any year exceeded the agreed amount beyond the indexation provisions; and, if so, by how much, for what purposes, and at the initiative of which parties? (5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(2) What amount of funding did the Commonwealth provide, or, in the case of the current year, will it provide? (3) In dollar amounts, what portion was provided in each year as part of the defined CSDA and the defined bilateral agreement? (4) Have the payments in any year exceeded the agreed amount beyond the indexation provisions; and, if so, by how much, for what purposes, and at the initiative of which parties? (5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(3) In dollar amounts, what portion was provided in each year as part of the defined CSDA and the defined bilateral agreement? (4) Have the payments in any year exceeded the agreed amount beyond the indexation provisions; and, if so, by how much, for what purposes, and at the initiative of which parties? (5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(4) Have the payments in any year exceeded the agreed amount beyond the indexation provisions; and, if so, by how much, for what purposes, and at the initiative of which parties? (5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(4)-(5) None.
(1) What amount of funding was pledged to Western Australia by the Commonwealth under the Commonwealth-State Disability Agreement? (2) What amount of funding did the Commonwealth provide, or, in the case of the current year, will it provide? (3) In dollar amounts, what portion was provided in each year as part of the defined CSDA and the defined bilateral agreement? (4) Have the payments in any year exceeded the agreed amount beyond the indexation provisions; and, if so, by how much, for what purposes, and at the initiative of which parties? (5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(2) What amount of funding did the Commonwealth provide, or, in the case of the current year, will it provide? (3) In dollar amounts, what portion was provided in each year as part of the defined CSDA and the defined bilateral agreement? (4) Have the payments in any year exceeded the agreed amount beyond the indexation provisions; and, if so, by how much, for what purposes, and at the initiative of which parties? (5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(3) In dollar amounts, what portion was provided in each year as part of the defined CSDA and the defined bilateral agreement? (4) Have the payments in any year exceeded the agreed amount beyond the indexation provisions; and, if so, by how much, for what purposes, and at the initiative of which parties? (5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(4) Have the payments in any year exceeded the agreed amount beyond the indexation provisions; and, if so, by how much, for what purposes, and at the initiative of which parties? (5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(5) Have any payments not been received by the State, been received late, or been less than the amount agreed? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(1) 1997-98 $22.005 million. 1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1998-99 $23.987 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2000-01 $27.060 million. 2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2001-02 $28.254 million. (2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(2) 1997-98 $22.505 million. 1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1998-99 $24.312 million. 1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1999-2000 $25.897 million. 2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2000-01 $32.716 million. 2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2001-02 $39.731 million. (3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(3) $ million $ million Base Agreement Bilateral 1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1997-98 22.005 0.500 1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1998-99 23.977 0.335 1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
1999-2000 25.232 0.665 2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2000-01 27.811 4.905 2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
2001-02 29.921 9.810 (4)-(5) None.
(4)-(5) None.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.