❓ A WA parliamentary question regarding the abolition of a Community Grants Assessment Committee, its funding, and the decision-making process. The answer clarifies the committee's association with the Office of Multicultural Interests, not the National Trust.
AnsweredQoN 3072Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
In relation to the Premier’s announcement that he has abolished the National Trust of Australia (WA)’s Community Grants Assessment Committee, I ask:
(a) what is the budgeted amount of funding this committee was supposed to disperse in 2009–2010?
(b) how much funding was dispersed;
(c) who will now be making the decisions previously made by this committee;
(d) what is the budgeted amount of funding for equivalent grants in the 2010–2011 budget; and
(e) what are the cost savings from abolishing this committee and where have those savings been allocated?
(a) what is the budgeted amount of funding this committee was supposed to disperse in 2009–2010?
(b) how much funding was dispersed;
(c) who will now be making the decisions previously made by this committee;
(d) what is the budgeted amount of funding for equivalent grants in the 2010–2011 budget; and
(e) what are the cost savings from abolishing this committee and where have those savings been allocated?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
23 June 2010
Responded by
Minister for Heritage
Response time
29 days
The Community Grants Assessment Committee was not associated with the National Trust of Australia (WA), but with the Office of Multicultural Interests.
(a) $250,000
(b) $250,000
(c) The Committee made recommendations, not decisions. A panel of community representatives will be established to assess the applications against specified criteria and make recommendations. There is no need for an ongoing Committee.
(d) $250,000
(e) Nil
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(a) $250,000
(b) $250,000
(c) The Committee made recommendations, not decisions. A panel of community representatives will be established to assess the applications against specified criteria and make recommendations. There is no need for an ongoing Committee.
(d) $250,000
(e) Nil
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.